[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WusawkWX8E[/youtube]
which is weird because he went from 11th to 1st
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7083e/7083ea32033176d55689307093ba65dab76646eb" alt="Wtf? :wtf:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff541/ff5410e0565a2b5cc9ff123a185199e8abfed523" alt="Confused :?"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/522d3/522d32c3a5072ba6a7ab259619ba03a59d2d7784" alt="Razz :-P"
I don't think you can conclude that from one GP, mostly because tyre management depends almost entirely on temperatures... However, the general trend seems to be that Ferrari's tyres hang on better than McLaren's.Tomba wrote:Can we also deduce from this GP that McLaren has worse tyre management than Ferrari? Hamilton's tyres were absolutely dead 2 laps from the end while Alonso comfortably finished, although they claimed there was "not much left".
He could only have avoided the situation by backing out of the fight completely and simply letting Maldonado past. Once you start doing that you're giving a green light to all the drivers to just dive up the inside expecting you to get out of the way. You cannot do that and expect to be a top racing driver and long term you increase the risk of collision as drivers get more and more ambitious in passing you expecting you to be the one to back out of it.
Well, if I recall well it is what Hamilton was expecting last year. I think both drivers had to be blame in this case. Also, they have damaged themsels to score good points
I am not saying is not Maldonado fault, but he had two options run over the kerbs and maybe damage his car or rejoing the track turning left, and he decided for the second, I don't think it was his intention to crash with Hamilton, but I think and that it is my point of view, Hamilton should have left a bit of space and show some maturity as he has been showing this year, and probably both would have get good points at the end. 75% Maldonado fault for deciding in fractions of a second to rejoin the track as he did. 25% Hamilton fault for not leaving a bit of space and finish the raceAll Lewis did was defend his position and he actually won the racing line back through the corner. Maldonado wasn't even on track, yet you feel he might have had a right of way??
You could try : http://en.mclarenf-1.com/kooleracer wrote:Anyone knows a website with the laptimes from the drivers for all 57 laps of the race?
thx
And the two times Maldonado has been caught intentionally crashing his car in to other drivers? Are we just meant to forget about those. This isn't just about Valencia. This is about a driver that is clearly dangerous, and seems to think he can just drive his car in to other people, and they have to get out of the way. Valencia he jumped the curb and that was most likely the cause of the contact, but what was he doing driving across the curb in the first place!? He should have conceded when Hamilton won the racing line, he seemed to think Hamilton should have moved aside and let him 'drive side-by-side'...CMSMJ1 wrote: Am sick to my back teeth of the immature name calling on Maldonado - grow the f.ck up you guys. No need at all. He is impulsive, he made a badly judged return to the track but I also feel that Lewis needed not to be fighing so hard. As someone posted earlier - know when to give up.
But in Canada Hamilton had better tyre life than Vettel, and here it was completely reversed. It's all about getting the setup just right, and in Valencia as with Bahrain McLaren just got it wrong. It seems they do not have a good setup for when the temperatures are very high.beelsebob wrote:I don't think you can conclude that from one GP, mostly because tyre management depends almost entirely on temperatures... However, the general trend seems to be that Ferrari's tyres hang on better than McLaren's.Tomba wrote:Can we also deduce from this GP that McLaren has worse tyre management than Ferrari? Hamilton's tyres were absolutely dead 2 laps from the end while Alonso comfortably finished, although they claimed there was "not much left".
Quite – exactly my point in fact – you can't deduce that the car is improved from the fact that they were faster here... They were similarly faster in Bahrain, because again – high temperatures, and traction track.myurr wrote:But in Canada Hamilton had better tyre life than Vettel, and here it was completely reversed. It's all about getting the setup just right, and in Valencia as with Bahrain McLaren just got it wrong. It seems they do not have a good setup for when the temperatures are very high.beelsebob wrote:I don't think you can conclude that from one GP, mostly because tyre management depends almost entirely on temperatures... However, the general trend seems to be that Ferrari's tyres hang on better than McLaren's.Tomba wrote:Can we also deduce from this GP that McLaren has worse tyre management than Ferrari? Hamilton's tyres were absolutely dead 2 laps from the end while Alonso comfortably finished, although they claimed there was "not much left".
n smikle wrote:Hamilton is a true racer so he never gives positions away without a fight.
+1Tomba wrote:On Hamilton, I do think he should have been wise enough to let Maldonado past, like Alonso did at the end of the Canadian GP. There's no point in fighting a car that's 3 seconds a lap faster. I still believe Maldonado was at fault, but Hamilton's ruthless defence cost him his own points as well.
Yes, heroic Spaniards (or idiots) putting their lives on the line (and that of the field) to keep Alonso's gap by getting the car off the track before Charlie Brown could send out the safety car.MuseF1 wrote:Accidentally posted this in the maldonado thread. did anybody see three marshalls on track pushing vettels car away without yellow flags. im pretty sure i seen a green flag next to them as they pushed his car