Mercedes AMG F1 W03

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Huntresa
Huntresa
54
Joined: 03 Dec 2011, 11:33

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

mantikos wrote:The body work around the exhaust is different, the preceeding bump is gone

Its still there

User avatar
ReLax
0
Joined: 30 Jan 2012, 20:10
Location: Norderstedt

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Okay guys, any new updates on the W03? Or are there only some suspicious new internal "Updates" which are bringing better "tyre management" ?

User avatar
Joie de vivre
2
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 10:12

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

ReLax wrote:Okay guys, any new updates on the W03? Or are there only some suspicious new internal "Updates" which are bringing better "tyre management" ?
they haven't been updating exterior for a quite time ... only downgrading :) I heard they'll run with no FW on next race =D>

elf341
elf341
5
Joined: 10 Aug 2011, 19:31

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Yes, :? Monkey seat has gone again...

elf341
elf341
5
Joined: 10 Aug 2011, 19:31

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Anybody know what this contraption is?

Image

User avatar
Morteza
2308
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 18:23
Location: Bushehr, Iran

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

elf341 wrote:Yes, :? Monkey seat has gone again...
I believe both cars had it on them.
"A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool."~William Shakespeare

User avatar
Ferraripilot
21
Joined: 28 Jan 2011, 16:36
Location: Atlanta

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Looks like the repositioned the barge boards to be outboard of the turning vane which were previously positioned more outboard of the apex of the sidepods. This new positioning shows they are trying to further condition the flow from the turning vanes under the nose and around the side pods.

elf341
elf341
5
Joined: 10 Aug 2011, 19:31

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Morteza wrote: I believe both cars had it on them.
Was that in FP2? I only watched FP1, and I haven't been able to find a pic from FP1 with it on, they both have it off.

User avatar
Morteza
2308
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 18:23
Location: Bushehr, Iran

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

elf341 wrote:
Morteza wrote: I believe both cars had it on them.
Was that in FP2? I only watched FP1, and I haven't been able to find a pic from FP1 with it on, they both have it off.
I missed FP1 as a matter of fact. So yes, the cars had monkey seat in FP2.
"A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool."~William Shakespeare

User avatar
Artur Craft
40
Joined: 05 Feb 2010, 15:50

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Joie de vivre wrote:
ReLax wrote:Okay guys, any new updates on the W03? Or are there only some suspicious new internal "Updates" which are bringing better "tyre management" ?
they haven't been updating exterior for a quite time ... only downgrading :) I heard they'll run with no FW on next race =D>
:lol:

Seems the fw cascade is gone for good and the main flap is quite flat also. I think Wesley123 might be right, W03 must lack rear df and the additional df they were running on the fws were useless. They have a very good speed trap this weekend, so at least they assume their lack of df and goes completely for straightline advantadge
n smikle wrote: Regulations this year reward having more rear downforce. This year's front wings have too much downforce believe it or not, they are actually unbalancing he car. Mecedez could afford to lose downforce on the front to gain better air conditioning for the middle and rear of the car.
Actually, this have been the case since the regulations change in 2009 and that's why Newey said that high noses are the only way after that.

Current diffusers are too small, cars remain with a big ride height(since 1994 with introduction of wooden plank) and rw lost 25% of it's span, although teams use bigger chord to compensate for it.

The front wing is way too big and is allowed to be ran quite low nowadays, and that gives more front df than ever in F1.

Cars from 80s and mid 90s had more balance towards the rear as they had the usual 1 meter rear wingspan, ran lower/closer to the ground and had bigger diffuser. Their fws had the usual 1,4m of span and were pretty poor developed back then, and that's why almost all teams used low noses to add more downforce to the front.

With the current regulation, is all about throwing all the design to the rear and that includes designing a fw which better routes airflow to the rest of the car.

User avatar
yener
4
Joined: 09 May 2011, 00:00

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Putting the front or rear wing lower doesnt give more downforce. Placing them higher does.

I think AMG is not spending to much time on the body aerodynamics because the real issues are inside the bodywork.

Also i do not believe they haven't have any upgrades, they are just not viewable from the outside.
"Life is about passions - Thank you for sharing mine" MSC

Owen.C93
Owen.C93
177
Joined: 24 Jul 2010, 17:52

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

yener wrote:Putting the front or rear wing lower doesnt give more downforce. Placing them higher does.
Put the front wing low enough and it starts getting ground effect. Lowering front wings definitely gives more DF.
Motorsport Graduate in search of team experience ;)

wunderkind
wunderkind
5
Joined: 04 Apr 2007, 06:12

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

As Brawn has said, the Mercedes-AMG guys are taking a step back in the development race and trying to understanding how to best utilise the tyres. There is no point putting all their resources into developing aero parts when they don't know how to get the most out of the tyres.

I don't know, but the two teams that seems to be utilising the Pirelli tyres the best at the moment, the Sauber and the Willliams, have had a history of producing understeering cars......................Just saying.

User avatar
Joie de vivre
2
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 10:12

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

and even those 2 teams understand the tyres ... were are they? definitely not on the top. they are focusing to much on the tyres. anyway, another wasted season

User avatar
Pierce89
60
Joined: 21 Oct 2009, 18:38

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

wunderkind wrote:As Brawn has said, the Mercedes-AMG guys are taking a step back in the development race and trying to understanding how to best utilise the tyres. There is no point putting all their resources into developing aero parts when they don't know how to get the most out of the tyres.

I don't know, but the two teams that seems to be utilising the Pirelli tyres the best at the moment, the Sauber and the Willliams, have had a history of producing understeering cars......................Just saying.
So how do the aerodynamicists help with understanding the tires? Brawn is being disingenuous if he says they've totally halted aero development.
“To be able to actually make something is awfully nice”
Bruce McLaren on building his first McLaren racecars, 1970

“I've got to be careful what I say, but possibly to probably Juan would have had a bigger go”
Sir Frank Williams after the 2003 Canadian GP, where Ralf hesitated to pass brother M. Schumacher