Tommy Cookers wrote:.....it looks like a good argument for a compressor driven independently of a 'Thermal Energy' Recovery turbine/'MGUH' !.....
Decoupling the compressor and turbine speeds would be a very attractive proposition, since it would significantly improve the performance of each. It would be even better if a TERS could be incorporated into the system.
"Q: How do you make a small fortune in racing?
A: Start with a large one!"
Tommy Cookers wrote:.....it looks like a good argument for a compressor driven independently of a 'Thermal Energy' Recovery turbine/'MGUH' !.....
Decoupling the compressor and turbine speeds would be a very attractive proposition, since it would significantly improve the performance of each. It would be even better if a TERS could be incorporated into the system.
Companies have already decoupled them. They basically use a small KERS unit to take power from the turbine to a battery, then use that energy to drive the compressor. Either Race Tech or Racecar Engineering had an article a couple years back. It allows the turbine to obviously spool faster, but the battery power can keep the compressor spooled up off throttle anyways.
“To be able to actually make something is awfully nice”
Bruce McLaren on building his first McLaren racecars, 1970
“I've got to be careful what I say, but possibly to probably Juan would have had a bigger go”
Sir Frank Williams after the 2003 Canadian GP, where Ralf hesitated to pass brother M. Schumacher
Muskrat wrote:Sounds sensible - like an old CART racer on a DFX and the later 2.6 V8's then.
yep. Or like the current Honda turbo v6 Indy motor(I think they've got it mounted in the bellhousing, though)
“To be able to actually make something is awfully nice”
Bruce McLaren on building his first McLaren racecars, 1970
“I've got to be careful what I say, but possibly to probably Juan would have had a bigger go”
Sir Frank Williams after the 2003 Canadian GP, where Ralf hesitated to pass brother M. Schumacher