ps: Jhonny Cecotto IS ON FIRE RIGHT NOW ! HOLY GOD
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c84f8/c84f83da76bd042682948f05c75399fc419a6b0c" alt="Surprised :o"
I dunno if it's changed since then, but that shows for me just barely the tail end of a storm might just clip the city at 8pm, and quickly clear.Hail22 wrote:http://www.weather.com/weather/map/inte ... e+SNXX0006
Doppler radar suggests otherwise, rain expected 8pm with thunder [-o< [-o< [-o< [-o< [-o< [-o< [-o<
Which points to cars and setup being a bigger performance differentiator in the wet than drivers are - which is what I think zeph is mostly referring to.beelsebob wrote:Yes, and they still do, but it's well known the MP4-27 is a disaster in the wet.zeph wrote:As recently as four years ago everybody was praising Hamilton as the rainmeister.
FIA 36.2 wrote:If more than one driver fails to set a time during Q1, Q2 or Q3 they will be arranged inSlife wrote:36.2 b) of the Sporting Regulations, or just scroll up and see my original post.LionKing wrote: Can you point to that in the regulations perhaps?
Yep, exactly!SpliT wrote:Schumacher is ahead of Rosberg because of lower car number. Schumacher car. 7, Rosberg car. 8.
It probably wont snowandartop wrote:any updates on the weather?
It's primarily done as a night race to suit the European TV audience. It's basically on about the same time as the European races are. That's also why Bernie was/is pushing Australia to be a night GPbeelsebob wrote:Looks like the storms are gonna miss just now, but really, this kind of weather is 100% unpredictable. I was under the impression though that this was done as a night race (rather than night to day) to avoid the evening storms, so I'd imagine it'll be fine, even if it starts damp.
AND?SpliT wrote:Schumacher is ahead of Rosberg because of lower car number. Schumacher car. 7, Rosberg car. 8.