and welcome pack v2?
i know your busy mate, just keeping ya on your toes
yeah its quite nice, it means it is pretty quick round the track, but I have done CFD before on a previous design and found I lacked rear downforce, so I worked on balance a lot and I have learned a lot,machin wrote:Yeah, very good.
What's impressive with your Design Nick is how well balanced it is right out of the box: 45:55ish front:rear is pretty close to the mass distribution. More downforce overall would be good of course,
I hope everyone is taking note of those for their designs!
thought this might have been the case.N12ck wrote:Hi,
Yes I rushed out V1, there is no rush with V2 as this track coming up is just for bragging rights basically, and for us to check everything, also Julien has done a writeup as a starting point (featuring images of my car + data)
http://www.khamsinvirtualracecarchallen ... d-analysis
just showing that we are still here and listening
how did you work out those figures? using the COP?machin wrote:Yeah, very good.
What's impressive with your Design Nick is how well balanced it is right out of the box: 45:55ish front:rear is pretty close to the mass distribution. More downforce overall would be good of course,
I hope everyone is taking note of those for their designs!