The French wing is in background. Was it ever tested in free practice?
I wonder how the French test was seemingly wasted.
The 2 large shark gills?raymondu999 wrote:
To my eye those look like intakes rather than exhausts. Or is perspective playing tricks on me?
Been there most of the season.markp wrote:The 2 large shark gills?raymondu999 wrote:To my eye those look like intakes rather than exhausts. Or is perspective playing tricks on me?
You mean this additional/"conditional" cooling hole... on that pic below (Korean GP) is in "cold" (aprox. T = 293 K) weather covered with small plate...nhojekim wrote:raymondu999 wrote: To my eye those look like intakes rather than exhausts. Or is perspective playing tricks on me?
Yeah..it looks more like intakes....hmmmm what's going on ferrari...
I know I am struggling to see what holes members are saying is an intake or outtake all the holes present have been there for ages. The one at the side of the exhaust is always seen in pre race pics but is covered as well sometimes.Consider&Go wrote:Been there most of the season.markp wrote:The 2 large shark gills?raymondu999 wrote:To my eye those look like intakes rather than exhausts. Or is perspective playing tricks on me?
Hi, maybe the holes pabloeing and huntresa refer to could be the ones encircled and pointed in this picture:markp wrote:I know I am struggling to see what holes members are saying is an intake or outtake all the holes present have been there for ages. The one at the side of the exhaust is always seen in pre race pics but is covered as well sometimes.
BBC F1 technical analyst Gary Anderson
"Ferrari have two different rear wings here and they're back-to-backing that. But they've just done a straight-line test so they really should know which is best. I call that wasting time at a race meeting. They also have two different front wings here. Now, they're a bit more tricky to be sure about." BBC