Red Bull RB8 Renault

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Owen.C93
Owen.C93
177
Joined: 24 Jul 2010, 17:52

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

Not sure why the plank would rub on low fuel with DRS. Very strange.
Motorsport Graduate in search of team experience ;)

irang
irang
8
Joined: 25 Dec 2011, 18:43

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

gilgen wrote:The car was sparking for a lap or two, outside any DRS zone! And, with nobody in front of him.
Yeah, obviously I didn't remember it correctly. :oops: Anyways, Mark thinks something was broken.

Webber said that kerbs might have caused some damage.
“Something was broken underneath, similar to Seb in the [last] race, but not a big deal.

myurr
myurr
9
Joined: 20 Mar 2008, 21:58

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

gilgen wrote:Still, it's funny (not) how the Red Bull detractors automatically say the car is illegal, despite the fact that other cars could also be seen sparking at times.
When I raised the issue I didn't say the car was illegal. I'm sure that to Red Bull's interpretation of the rules it's 100% legal, and it will only come down to whether the FIA agree or disagree with that interpretation. As the car passes scrutineering it would appear that based on the information they currently have the FIA agree that it is legal.

However, it does call into question the team's honesty about the cause of all the sparking at the last race. And if they' are lying about the cause of these issues, then what are they trying to hide?

This was a big issue for Webber today, whatever it ultimately was. He lost a lot of time in the pits, and it didn't seem that they could stop the floor from sparking. They then suffered a big coolant leak, on I believe the same side of the car that was sparking, with the team not properly noticing the leak as they sent the car out. They were also trying to patch the floor up with tape!

All in all there is definitely something going on there and the team are being very cagey about it. As such it warrants investigation and discussion, rather than shouting down.

Ozan
Ozan
10
Joined: 05 Jan 2012, 01:50

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

CottrellGP wrote:
Ozan wrote:I think RB8's latest floor is illegal. it still shows sparkles like it did in india. FIA should scrutinize this car.
Even though it passed all the scrutineers tests?, damn Mclaren fans :lol:

I was a fan of Mercedes AMG though...

User avatar
ringo
230
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

You know what,

This car has a most blatant advantage over the other cars and yet no one saw it.
It's staring us right in the face.

RB8effectively has 2 diffusers....

How you may ask?

The second diffuser is on top of the main diffuser. 8)

Image

The diffuser is formed by the vertical strakes and the cowling over the driveshafts, and im not being imaginative or overly creative. It doesn't look like it, but it is functioning in the same way as the main diffuser, only in a perpendicular plane. The vanes act to expand the air in just the same way, regardless of orientation. Very simple and straightforward, just not obvious. It was the proximity of the vanes to the "endplates" aka cowlings that raised the red flag.
Those cowlings are basically creating a lot of downforce. Not only that there are positive effects on surrounding body parts.
Unfortunately most teams can't copy this, so redbull are still safe. I should have realized this 5 races ago. :D
For Sure!!

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

And the resultant low pressure above the "normal" diffuser doesn't create lift... why, exactly?
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

User avatar
ringo
230
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

It's not as simple as that most times. The distance between the two relative to the chord length of the cowling will determine it.
Also keep in mind the curvature of the upper surface of the main diffuser is a factor as well.
It's not really how effective the upper one is, it's the fact that overall they have an advantage. 2 diffusers with one at 20% effectiveness is still better than 1 main diffuser, if you get what i mean.
For Sure!!

User avatar
siskue2005
70
Joined: 11 May 2007, 21:50

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

if i am not mistaken they have that "2 diffusors" / gurney flap since Monxa 2011?
when mark crashed and they lifted his car, there were many pictures back then

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

Ringo - why would you even want low pressure ABOVE the "normal" diffuser - it's not sucking down on anything, but it would in fact suck up on the floor - REDUCING your net downforce.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

myurr
myurr
9
Joined: 20 Mar 2008, 21:58

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

raymondu999 wrote:Ringo - why would you even want low pressure ABOVE the "normal" diffuser - it's not sucking down on anything, but it would in fact suck up on the floor - REDUCING your net downforce.
If that were the case then any double diffuser design would be doomed to failure. Don't forget that this upper deck is operating as a fixed and sealed tunnel, so its effects on other components will only be at the point where air enters and exits that tunnel. You still have air pressure above the tunnel pushing down on the lower diffuser deck underneath the tunnel, with that force transmitted through the rigid structure of the tunnel.

* caveated with being an armchair engineer with no aero experience at all!

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

The double diffuser design still created the low pressure BELOW the floor - not above it. Ringo is saying they use their coke bottle as a second diffuser
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

henra
henra
53
Joined: 11 Mar 2012, 19:34

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

raymondu999 wrote:And the resultant low pressure above the "normal" diffuser doesn't create lift... why, exactly?
Hi, total newby here. Have been reading for quite some time, though.

Just out of curiosity (and probably stupid): Could they potentially try to extract air from the starter motor hole with this low pressure above the floor? A kind of little reminiscence to the double diffusers ?!

User avatar
Forza
238
Joined: 08 Sep 2010, 20:55

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

ABD FP3
Problems with brake system on Vettel's car. They've changed the brake calipers.
Image

shelly
shelly
136
Joined: 05 May 2009, 12:18

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

A ferrari insider (user fabioc) has posted on an italian forum (blogf1.it) that one of the elements of rbr performance is a special dispensation from fia which allows renault powerd cars, officially for reliability issues, to move coolant liquid between different reservoirs, thus optimising weight distribution. merc and ferrrari not allowed to do that, even if they have already asked for it.

there are other elements in rbr performance, but iirc this is the first time something like that comes up.
I think the source is reliable
twitter: @armchair_aero

myurr
myurr
9
Joined: 20 Mar 2008, 21:58

Re: Red Bull RB8 Renault

Post

shelly wrote:A ferrari insider (user fabioc) has posted on an italian forum (blogf1.it) that one of the elements of rbr performance is a special dispensation from fia which allows renault powerd cars, officially for reliability issues, to move coolant liquid between different reservoirs, thus optimising weight distribution. merc and ferrrari not allowed to do that, even if they have already asked for it.

there are other elements in rbr performance, but iirc this is the first time something like that comes up.
I think the source is reliable
Very interesting, and could explain the leak Webber had on Friday.