Yeah some things i think as they said they was bringing updates have to wait further into weekend for people to find them or for ferrari to sayalogoc wrote:Is there anything new at all?
Yeah some things i think as they said they was bringing updates have to wait further into weekend for people to find them or for ferrari to sayalogoc wrote:Is there anything new at all?
That'll be hard if they have 2 or 3 different wings to bolt on, perhaps a couple of floors, or maybe various dampers and brake pads to try out.alogoc wrote:Isn't the car that is going to scrutineering required to have all new parts bolted on?
You should read the preseason Ferrari F2012 speculation threadten_marco wrote:Ps.: The level of the blog greatly improved, for even 3 races ago that had speculation about possible new parts were worthy of the Star Wars movies.
Looks just like transit damage.C Plinius Secundus wrote:This is new. Not even FIAT does something like this.
What's going on? Are they glueing the parts with chewing gum?
C Plinius Secundus wrote:This is new. Not even FIAT does something like this.
What's going on? Are they glueing the parts with chewing gum?
Yes, it could be transit damage. But even in that case, they could use some product like Loctite Hysol 9340 or similar… not chewing gum, mylar tape, or whatever they're using. It looks unprofessional (and probably works alike)gilgen wrote:Looks just like transit damage.C Plinius Secundus wrote:This is new. Not even FIAT does something like this.
What's going on? Are they glueing the parts with chewing gum?
gilgen wrote:Looks just like transit damage.C Plinius Secundus wrote:This is new. Not even FIAT does something like this.
What's going on? Are they glueing the parts with chewing gum?
No its just "transit" protection...adam2003 wrote:C Plinius Secundus wrote:This is new. Not even FIAT does something like this.
You know the areo flaps in the pic don't know what they are called. they look at different angles , say for example they was 1mm higher angel would it disrupt the airflow are all the areo pieces engineered to be within 100percent or can their be less than 1mm tolerance on the angles that deflect air? Sorry if it doesn't make much sence what i am trying to ask
They're usually called "rear brake duct fins", and AFAIK, as far as the area of the fins is within the maximum value, the angle is free.adam2003 wrote:C Plinius Secundus wrote:This is new. Not even FIAT does something like this.
What's going on? Are they glueing the parts with chewing gum?
You know the areo flaps in the pic don't know what they are called. they look at different angles , say for example they was 1mm higher angel would it disrupt the airflow are all the areo pieces engineered to be within 100percent or can their be less than 1mm tolerance on the angles that deflect air? Sorry if it doesn't make much sence what i am trying to ask
They're usually called "rear brake duct fins", and AFAIK, as far as the area of the fins is within the maximum value, the angle is free.adam2003 wrote:C Plinius Secundus wrote:This is new. Not even FIAT does something like this.
What's going on? Are they glueing the parts with chewing gum?
You know the areo flaps in the pic don't know what they are called. they look at different angles , say for example they was 1mm higher angel would it disrupt the airflow are all the areo pieces engineered to be within 100percent or can their be less than 1mm tolerance on the angles that deflect air? Sorry if it doesn't make much sence what i am trying to ask
Well spotted!aleksandergreat wrote:gilgen wrote:Looks just like transit damage.C Plinius Secundus wrote:This is new. Not even FIAT does something like this.
What's going on? Are they glueing the parts with chewing gum?No its just "transit" protection...adam2003 wrote:C Plinius Secundus wrote:This is new. Not even FIAT does something like this.
You know the areo flaps in the pic don't know what they are called. they look at different angles , say for example they was 1mm higher angel would it disrupt the airflow are all the areo pieces engineered to be within 100percent or can their be less than 1mm tolerance on the angles that deflect air? Sorry if it doesn't make much sence what i am trying to ask
I correct myself. Seeing the drivers navigate those corners in FP1 I'm starting to fear that the RB might do them with the DRS open while the rest of the pack won't have enough downforce. Now that would be scarysuburbano wrote:The good news is that maybe the DRS won't make such big difference in qualifying because with all those corners there isn't really a lot of room to use it freely.