Safer on the outside perhaps.raymondu999 wrote:Does anyone remember the last time Alonso went for the inside line at turn 1 at the start of a grand prix? He seems to have developed a preference for going around the outside lately.
off the top of my head, i think Barcelona this year (but he didn't really have a choice there!).raymondu999 wrote:Does anyone remember the last time Alonso went for the inside line at turn 1 at the start of a grand prix? He seems to have developed a preference for going around the outside lately.
After Hamilton announced his move to Mercedes, he entered God mode.ajdavison2 wrote:So the questions that that raises; 1) have the 2012 cars developed that much? 2) Is Ham simply driving that much better this year? 3)Was the EBD effect around this circuit that minimal?
On 3) I would've thought that the off throttle EBD was very effective around the slow corners in sector 2, and that was why Red Bull got relatively comfortable 1-2s in 2010 and particularly 2011.ajdavison2 wrote:So the questions that that raises; 1) have the 2012 cars developed that much? 2) Is Ham simply driving that much better this year? 3)Was the EBD effect around this circuit that minimal?
Well, that's always the case when you support someone in the fastest car I liked wet/dry races in 96-99, hated them in 07-08. But surely there's no denying that, for the audience at large, it will make for interesting watching tomorrow? You know that from Bernie's reaction alone...raymondu999 wrote:Not to me. I find them frustrating. I don't like races to be decided by variability and tyre decisions. I'd rather make it a clear choice to go for wet/inter/dry - and take it out on the track on pace.Gerhard Berger wrote:Wet/dry/wet/dry races are very exciting and unpredictable
Vettel was very slow heating his tyres up in Q1 though, he was well off the pace until the very end of the session when the track was not far off dry. He's also slightly faster in a straight line than Webber, so hasn't compromised his gearing. I honestly think it was just pressure - he made a small mistake on his first run and then had to play it a tiny bit safe on his final run rather than push to the absolute limit. Webber could just go for it without it having to worry about the risks of pushing.f1316 wrote:Well, that's always the case when you support someone in the fastest car I liked wet/dry races in 96-99, hated them in 07-08. But surely there's no denying that, for the audience at large, it will make for interesting watching tomorrow? You know that from Bernie's reaction alone...raymondu999 wrote:Not to me. I find them frustrating. I don't like races to be decided by variability and tyre decisions. I'd rather make it a clear choice to go for wet/inter/dry - and take it out on the track on pace.Gerhard Berger wrote:Wet/dry/wet/dry races are very exciting and unpredictable
Anyway, I have the suspicion that Vettel compromised his set-up a little compared to Webber, just to cover off the chance of rain. It explains why Webber, who looked much slower than Vettel in Q1, was suddenly faster. I think Vettel knew he could still beat Alonso in qualifying, even with a bit of compromise.
Button was only 0.055 second slower than Hamilton in Q3, they pretty much did the same time....ajdavison2 wrote:So the questions that that raises; 1) have the 2012 cars developed that much? 2) Is Ham simply driving that much better this year? 3)Was the EBD effect around this circuit that minimal?
That's pretty much a no --- statement, yes, the RB7 was a dominant car, the RB8 only became dominant (and not very) towards the end of the year.LionKing wrote:Button was only 0.055 second slower than Hamilton in Q3, they pretty much did the same time....ajdavison2 wrote:So the questions that that raises; 1) have the 2012 cars developed that much? 2) Is Ham simply driving that much better this year? 3)Was the EBD effect around this circuit that minimal?
Also Button outqualified Lewis last year with a time of 1.12.283. Vettel's last year's pole time is 1.11.918.
So Red Bull has lost about 0.66 seconds compared to Mclaren's 0.18 seconds. That means McLaren developed relatively more (or regressed less) compared to RBR under current regulations.