Overheating issues? I thought it was just burnt paint, which doesn't signify overheating.beelsebob wrote:Pretty significant update to the exhaust area there, hopefully that will sort the overheating issue there.
It signifies that that bit of bodywork is hotter than they expected/intended it to be – they did not design the car to burn the advertising billboards off the side (otherwise people wouldn't pay them), thus, it absolutely was overheating relative to design specifications.Cocles wrote:Overheating issues? I thought it was just burnt paint, which doesn't signify overheating.beelsebob wrote:Pretty significant update to the exhaust area there, hopefully that will sort the overheating issue there.
Was there actual overheating issues mentioned somewhere that I missed?
They use as much silver paint as possible at the first test for the debut. That's been established here before, so that doesn't mean it wasn't expected. As we see now, they've painted those sections with a heat resistant black.beelsebob wrote:It signifies that that bit of bodywork is hotter than they expected/intended it to be – they did not design the car to burn the advertising billboards off the side (otherwise people wouldn't pay them), thus, it absolutely was overheating relative to design specifications.Cocles wrote:Overheating issues? I thought it was just burnt paint, which doesn't signify overheating.beelsebob wrote:Pretty significant update to the exhaust area there, hopefully that will sort the overheating issue there.
Was there actual overheating issues mentioned somewhere that I missed?
THis post.n smikle wrote:Scarbs is always full of words but never numbers. He didn't say whether the Passive F-duct (that is what the DRD essentially) is, gives down-force or takes it away.. He also has no interior details on the switch itself.kris wrote:I do understand that part.. I was wondering more in terms of the theory behind the concept?stefan_ wrote:One of the differences that doesn't qualify it as an "f-duct" is that the driver has no influence on the system in directing the air or allowing/disrupting airflow to go to the main flap.
Again guys, I will say this... most of these F1 "puzzles" are usually solved first on this very website, then copied by others. You can find the answer you just to have confidence and think for yourself, or even discuss the concept with others. Guys like Scarb's and Keith Kollantine aren't always right.
My preliminary CFD simulations show that the DRD is a down-force adder in its normal state. And when it switches the air jets turn off and the down-force and some drag is reduced.
The car has a gearbox failure, thats why its sidelined.beelsebob wrote:Something (perhaps it's only 14 laps, and no running for ages) makes me wonder if the car has broken.
AMuS said Mercedes thought they may have a Gearbox Problem and opened it up to be sure. That's why he Rosberg didn't drive that much.beelsebob wrote:Something (perhaps it's only 14 laps, and no running for ages) makes me wonder if the car has broken.
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
They inspected it? For 4 hours?Dyanxx wrote:Apparently they suspected a gearbox problem, so they inspected it and will be back out shortly.
well...they said they would be back on track after the lunch break. it's already been an hour since the re-start and no sign. another wasted day indeed.Thunders wrote:AMuS said Mercedes thought they may have a Gearbox Problem and opened it up to be sure. That's why he Rosberg didn't drive that much.beelsebob wrote:Something (perhaps it's only 14 laps, and no running for ages) makes me wonder if the car has broken.
Edit: narf, too late.....