There is some seriously nice detailing on that car.
The detail definitely does indicate - without a good tunnel that is well calibrated - your screwed.
It seems like the DRD piping coincides with a larger DRS Actuator Housing. It also looks like there's some small openings on the side of the actuator housing. Would there be any benefit to blowing the top-side of an open-DRS rear wing?Blackout wrote:Looks like they finally added the lower pipe of the DRD.
http://www.servimg.com/image_preview.ph ... u=14795526
E21's lower rear wishbone and the transmission rod are on the same plane but they are not close to each other. And the track rod is lower. Can they move them (wishbone and/or trackrod) in order to cover them with the transmission rod?Ferraripilot wrote:Lotus are missing something all other top teams have, and that is a suspension arm integrated covered driveshaft. I'm wondering how much of an effect having the magnus effect still in place will be evident on this Lotus which certainly appears to be an otherwise great car, on paper so far anyway.
I never noticed that. I wonder if perhaps the fact that the Lotus is using a ramped exhaust a la Red Bull has to do with that - because then most of the air coming into contact with the open driveshaft is just the exhaust gases.Ferraripilot wrote:Lotus are missing something all other top teams have, and that is a suspension arm integrated covered driveshaft. I'm wondering how much of an effect having the magnus effect still in place will be evident on this Lotus which certainly appears to be an otherwise great car, on paper so far anyway.
I would've thought it was common courtesy to quote your source, especially considering that it's a commercially-available article rather than a free article: http://plus.autosport.com/premium/featu ... melbourne/Donuts wrote:It appears that Lotus has a rear wing airflow problem. This became apparent at the last test when, in the wet, the team detected that the direction of the airflow on the endplates was actually in reverse of how it was supposed to travel.
A camera was quickly fitted to look at the problem and more test time was dedicated to resolving the issue today. It appears the problem is at low speed and unrelated to the Drag Reduction device (DRD).
For the first time we have also seen the Lotus DRD inlets opened up - up until now these have been fitted with rounded covers. There's now the expectation that the team will devote some running later in the week to testing the device.
As the wet weather broke, Lotus needed to cover the inlets and used clear 'helicopter' tape, so despite appearances the inlets were covered for much of the day.
Now you've brought their team of copywrite lawyers down on us.raymondu999 wrote:I would've thought it was common courtesy to quote your source, especially considering that it's a commercially-available article rather than a free article: http://plus.autosport.com/premium/featu ... melbourne/Donuts wrote:It appears that Lotus has a rear wing airflow problem. This became apparent at the last test when, in the wet, the team detected that the direction of the airflow on the endplates was actually in reverse of how it was supposed to travel.
A camera was quickly fitted to look at the problem and more test time was dedicated to resolving the issue today. It appears the problem is at low speed and unrelated to the Drag Reduction device (DRD).
For the first time we have also seen the Lotus DRD inlets opened up - up until now these have been fitted with rounded covers. There's now the expectation that the team will devote some running later in the week to testing the device.
As the wet weather broke, Lotus needed to cover the inlets and used clear 'helicopter' tape, so despite appearances the inlets were covered for much of the day.
No, the person pasting the illegally copied quote hasDonuts wrote:Now you've brought their team of copywrite lawyers down on us.
Are you condoning the piracy and free distribution of their work, then?Donuts wrote:Now you've brought their team of copywrite lawyers down on us.