How does Top Gear benefit from Hamilton going 1.1 seconds quicker than Vettel? I don't understand why people can't just accept it that Hamilton went quicker, he set a very fast time in the wet, so of course when it was dry he was going to go a lot quicker in the dry.
If say Kimi or another driver, had set that time, everyone would be saying what a good driver he is, and there wouldn't be any talk of the lap being suspicious, but Hamilton on the other hand...