You dont mean Williams, do you ?beelsebob wrote:It seems bizarre to me that the team with the strongest, tightest coke bottle are testing a system that's known to impact the effect of the coke bottle.
Yes I do... Which other team has a micro gearbox so small that they can basically delete the back of the car?Blackout wrote:You dont mean Williams, do you ?beelsebob wrote:It seems bizarre to me that the team with the strongest, tightest coke bottle are testing a system that's known to impact the effect of the coke bottle.
IMO it's vindication that it's the quicker solution, provided you can get it to work.beelsebob wrote:It seems bizarre to me that the team with the strongest, tightest coke bottle are testing a system that's known to impact the effect of the coke bottle.
Not necessarily. The simplest solution, in my view, is always the better one. (And I'll take free flow over constricted flow every day.)raymondu999 wrote:IMO it's vindication that it's the quicker solution, provided you can get it to work.beelsebob wrote:It seems bizarre to me that the team with the strongest, tightest coke bottle are testing a system that's known to impact the effect of the coke bottle.
My instinct is that it's the quicker solution, provided you have a renault engine.raymondu999 wrote:IMO it's vindication that it's the quicker solution, provided you can get it to work.beelsebob wrote:It seems bizarre to me that the team with the strongest, tightest coke bottle are testing a system that's known to impact the effect of the coke bottle.
Those fins would have worked too on the ramp. They probably were only testing it out of the exhaust air was kept under those small fins. I think if it was allowed we would see a fully enclosed tunnel (with the exception of the slot) on the ramp.markp wrote:That this exhaust solution has been planned allalong it seems to suggest the illegal version of original exhaust meant othing. why did they do that?
My bet is that they tested both in CFD and possibly in the tunnel, and that they felt that McLaren's solution was better if they could use the fins, but Sauber's otherwise.markp wrote:That this exhaust solution has been planned allalong it seems to suggest the illegal version of original exhaust meant othing. why did they do that?
To stop the inevitable development of exhaust re-ingestion that other teams may have tried this seasonmarkp wrote:That this exhaust solution has been planned allalong it seems to suggest the illegal version of original exhaust meant othing. why did they do that?