That's what I'm thinking as well.BorisTheBlade wrote:Well, after taking a look at some of the testing shots my guess is that it's still the same solution. IMHO it just looks a bit out of proportion without the sidepod surrounding it.
That's what I'm thinking as well.BorisTheBlade wrote:Well, after taking a look at some of the testing shots my guess is that it's still the same solution. IMHO it just looks a bit out of proportion without the sidepod surrounding it.
Omg, I'm so curious to see the cars on track running top.Hail22 wrote:Ted Kravtiz has just eluded that Mercedes maybe running a hydraulic linked suspension system, if so...nice!
Because this system reacts to external induced changes of load, the lotus system was active in the way, that forces from the brake caliper were transferred to the suspension arms which changed in lenght. Merc`s version is legal, because it transfers load only "inside" the suspension system without changing the position of suspension arms itself.Trocola wrote:Why is this "fric" suspension legal and the lotus' one from last year not? I am talking about the front suspension that keep ride height costant on braking