Indeed, points at good balanceSpankyham wrote:That was my point - no monkey seat - which, to me means we don't need it =D>Matt Somers wrote:Didn't use one in Aus eitherSpankyham wrote:No monkey seat
Indeed, points at good balanceSpankyham wrote:That was my point - no monkey seat - which, to me means we don't need it =D>Matt Somers wrote:Didn't use one in Aus eitherSpankyham wrote:No monkey seat
Or points at less front dfMatt Somers wrote:Indeed, points at good balanceSpankyham wrote:That was my point - no monkey seat - which, to me means we don't need it =D>Matt Somers wrote:
Didn't use one in Aus either
Matt Somers wrote:Indeed, points at good balanceSpankyham wrote:That was my point - no monkey seat - which, to me means we don't need it =D>Matt Somers wrote:
Didn't use one in Aus either
Given the performance of the car to date I don't think that's likelywesley123 wrote:Or points at less front df
Or simply that the flow over the rear wing is reasonably stable.
Didn't use one in Aus either
That was my point - no monkey seat - which, to me means we don't need it =D>
Indeed, points at good balance
Or points at less front df
Its the Ferrari 2013 Car thread. My pictures help us explore the features of the car.Owen.C93 wrote:I personally only post pictures of new or interesting parts and maybe some rare angles.
I think the constant pics of cars just driving in a straight line is getting out of hand.