Helmut Marko is the dark force at RedBull.OppositeLock wrote: F1 is truly a shark tank. Helmut Marko gets a dagger in. "it's not like at Mercedes where there is a clear number one!"
Helmut Marko is the dark force at RedBull.OppositeLock wrote: F1 is truly a shark tank. Helmut Marko gets a dagger in. "it's not like at Mercedes where there is a clear number one!"
RTL just said it means Car 2 before car 1. Multi12 the other way around. Sounds logical...JMN wrote:What did Webber mean with "Yeah Seb, multi-21"?
Or if he'd been able to make it round another lap then maybe his fresher inters would have at least given him a bit of an edge over the cars around him. Field spread would have helped as well. One lap difference probably wasn't enough.1158 wrote:siskue2005 wrote:why didnt Alonso pit ???
the team was ready!...it was his decision i think...if he wanted to come in like he did at Melbourne he would have
i think he was hoping for a SC? or for the track to dry out
anyways it was a stupid decision
I wonder if he was hoping to go 1 more lap then switch to slicks. It was still too wet after the first lap, he would have had to go with inters.
Oooh, yeah that makes more sense than my theory.sjns wrote:RTL just said it means Car 2 before car 1. Multi12 the other way around. Sounds logical...JMN wrote:What did Webber mean with "Yeah Seb, multi-21"?
Hard to argue why Webber was with hard tyres in the last pit stopzeph wrote:Webber telling it like it is!
But it is hard to argue with the way Vettel took off after the overtake...
Yeah, even when Vet went to his slicks it was probably a lap early. I wonder if Alonso was hoping to make it several laps.myurr wrote:Or if he'd been able to make it round another lap then maybe his fresher inters would have at least given him a bit of an edge over the cars around him. Field spread would have helped as well. One lap difference probably wasn't enough.1158 wrote:siskue2005 wrote:why didnt Alonso pit ???
the team was ready!...it was his decision i think...if he wanted to come in like he did at Melbourne he would have
i think he was hoping for a SC? or for the track to dry out
anyways it was a stupid decision
I wonder if he was hoping to go 1 more lap then switch to slicks. It was still too wet after the first lap, he would have had to go with inters.
bhallg2k wrote:Strong personalities under contrived circumstances? It's a reality show. A very, very expensive reality show.Joie de vivre wrote:Everyone is looking after tyres. And then no one is allowed to race at maximum.
This ain't F1, it's just faster GP2. I'm pissed right now.
I thought there was a rule about driving with obvious damage. Alonso put all the drivers at risk. He was lucky to lose the front wing where he did.stefan_ wrote:I don't understand why did they keep Alonso out. That FW had no chance to resist under the loads of the two straights.
Vettel's behaviour is pure s**t.
Massa was great today. Bottas had a good race too, Bianchi again very good.
iotar__ wrote:Fuel saving, R. Brawn with despicable team orders, and pairs of team-mates finishing together, sounds like "pure racing" Bridgestone era. Surprisingly we didn't get five or so pitstops as "experts" on Sky predicted before the season (quickly corrected by Symonds).
I always said that beneath misleading teddy bear appearance Ross Brawn is one of the most ruthless people in F1. Undeservedly it was always Todt that was getting all the blame ("you say it Jean, I'm the nice guy"). Now it's time for Barrichello 2009 moment, when they lost him a race and somehow put Button ahead of him. Next time Rosberg won't know what hits him.
Grosjean had too good of a race, despite getting B spec car second time in a row in practice sessions. As a punishment he's going to get updates five races later now. What a joke Lotus is, shooting themselves in the foot constantly. What were they thinking? That they're going to have one stop advantage and Raikkonen not having to do any actual racing for the rest of the season? They should ditch idiotic only one driver exists policy quickly. Fat chance.