So two wrongs make a right? Especially when it's the second round and there's no drivers title on the line?Traction wrote:I'll just leave this here...even though it will be conveniently ignored
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/93001
So two wrongs make a right? Especially when it's the second round and there's no drivers title on the line?Traction wrote:I'll just leave this here...even though it will be conveniently ignored
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/93001
What about Lewis Hamilton's radio playing at 18:30, with the crowd looking up at the podium? Or Rosberg's radio with Hamilton on the podium? At both times both people were long out of their car.MWcrazyhorse wrote:
I checked that and they are not. It is difficult to tell as the radio overlaps, but at 20:32-20:40 in the interview bit on the podium video again: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xppm9tzXc8
you can tell that it is in sync, if you listen carefuly.
I think the point Traction was making is that - those living in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.Ray wrote:So two wrongs make a right? Especially when it's the second round and there's no drivers title on the line?Traction wrote:I'll just leave this here...even though it will be conveniently ignored
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/93001
He's done everything they asked of him, they've screwed him at every turn. Not to mention their "chief" consistently craps on him every chance he gets. There's open hostility against Mark Webber at Red Bull, I'd be pissed too. How many times has Helmut bad mouthed him in the press and Horner or any other executive just let it happen? The man is openly --- on by management, he has the right to complain when they screw him. Again.raymondu999 wrote:I think the point Traction was making is that - those living in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.Ray wrote:So two wrongs make a right? Especially when it's the second round and there's no drivers title on the line?Traction wrote:I'll just leave this here...even though it will be conveniently ignored
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/93001
Standings prior to 2011 British Grand PrixTraction wrote:I'll just leave this here...even though it will be conveniently ignored
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/93001
I must be missing something here. Webbers words certainly stated he hated team orders, his actions however, clearly showed he abides by them. The race result shows webber finished behind Vettel - as ordered.Traction wrote:I'll just leave this here...even though it will be conveniently ignored
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/93001
I think it's best to put the term in context and then we can see which makes more sense:MWcrazyhorse wrote:On what Multi 21 actualy means.
Near the bottom of this page:
http://www.racecar-engineering.com/cars/red-bull-rb9/
On the steering wheel on the right is the Mult(i) octagon with number of 1-8. On the left there are the numbers 1 to x. Could (multi) 2-1 be a combination of these numbers a 2 on the left and a 1 on the right?
Multi 21 = Adjust BiasWebber (angrily): "Fuel lean, Seb. Fuel lean". - maybe, doesn't really make sense.
Multi 21 = Hold PositionWebber (angrily): "Adjust bias, Seb. Adjust bias". - nope, don't think that's it.
Webber (angrily): "Hold position, Seb. Hold position". - winner?
Yes, but Webber was giving it plenty and trying to overtake Vettel that race.Cam wrote:I must be missing something here. Webbers words certainly stated he hated team orders, his actions however, clearly showed he abides by them. The race result shows webber finished behind Vettel - as ordered.Traction wrote:I'll just leave this here...even though it will be conveniently ignored
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/93001
What's the old saying about actions speak louder than....
It would be interesting to see if it really does cause him to resign - not that I think it would. But I think that would mean bye-bye WCC. I actually think that if it's a long-term thing rather than a one-off, RBR will go for one of the STR boys for an early promotion, rather than Buemi.Hail22 wrote:Webber is reportedly back in Queensland Australia with his manager discussing his options, A lot of people will most likely say "good, he's getting old" but I believe he has a wealth of knowledge, reliability, dependability about him...so if this is true and not rumour we may see Buemi driving in China...who knows
Giving vettel curry and disobeying direct orders are 2 separate things, IMO - certainly Webber never stole a race win.raymondu999 wrote:It would be interesting to see if it really does cause him to resign - not that I think it would. But I think that would mean bye-bye WCC. I actually think that if it's a long-term thing rather than a one-off, RBR will go for one of the STR boys for an early promotion, rather than Buemi.Hail22 wrote:Webber is reportedly back in Queensland Australia with his manager discussing his options, A lot of people will most likely say "good, he's getting old" but I believe he has a wealth of knowledge, reliability, dependability about him...so if this is true and not rumour we may see Buemi driving in China...who knows
How can you possibly be serious...completely ignored team orders, admitted to it and yet somehow Vettels disobeying is somehow worse. The only difference is that MW didn't have what it takes to get past SV in that race. He absolutely gave it a bash though and his intent was completely there. What MW has proved here is that although what SB did was ultimately wrong in so far as disobeying TO is that he is a huge hypocrite and so are all those who are bashing Seb for doing exactly what Mark tried to do but failed.Cam wrote:I must be missing something here. Webbers words certainly stated he hated team orders, his actions however, clearly showed he abides by them. The race result shows webber finished behind Vettel - as ordered.Traction wrote:I'll just leave this here...even though it will be conveniently ignored
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/93001
What's the old saying about actions speak louder than....