I believe what a lot are annoyed by is seeing their favorite drivers and teams driving to a delta. We have multiple pitstops, with cars cruising at 85% for a good chunk of the race. The trick would be to get around that trade off. Lots of pitstops... minimal driving to a delta.Nomore wrote:The tyres are the same for everyone since 2007.
I really don't understand why people complain about tyres, if they really think that their favorite driver or car is loosing and the fault is on the tyres...then they have to think that when their favorite driver or car won it was all down to the tyres.
Stop complaining the tyres are the same for everyone, and for us fans 2,3,4,5 pitstop are better than 1 pit stop.
Pirelli motorsport director Paul Hembery wrote:The medium tyre showed it could do a 20-lap stint, which is borderline two and three stops. The soft tyres are going quicker than we expected - about 1.5secs quicker than the medium.
If it was only degradation/grain, no one would have complained. When you design a car that can go 330kph+, but due to cheesy tyres, you compromise and underdrive the car, that's where the problem is. People watch F1 for flat out racing, not the drama of tyre endurance. That's not racing and whatever factor contributes for lack of racing, it gets blamed. Clear?Nomore wrote:The tyres are the same for everyone since 2007.
I really don't understand why people complain about tyres, if they really think that their favorite driver or car is loosing and the fault is on the tyres...then they have to think that when their favorite driver or car won it was all down to the tyres.
Stop complaining the tyres are the same for everyone, and for us fans 2,3,4,5 pitstop are better than 1 pit stop.
Yes, Pirelli's decision to pick the soft tyres is ridiculous.Unc1e_M0nty wrote:I didn't watch practice but I've just caught up on the live text on the BBC, I noticed this quote in 2nd practice - Mercedes' Lewis Hamilton over team radio: "I've never seen the tyres behave this way." Was it just the softs that were falling apart ?
from http://live.autosport.com/commentary.php/id/573Forza wrote:Pirelli motorsport director Paul Hembery wrote:The medium tyre showed it could do a 20-lap stint, which is borderline two and three stops. The soft tyres are going quicker than we expected - about 1.5secs quicker than the medium.
No clear not at all,prince wrote:If it was only degradation/grain, no one would have complained. When you design a car that can go 330kph+, but due to cheesy tyres, you compromise and underdrive the car, that's where the problem is. People watch F1 for flat out racing, not the dram of tyre endurance. That's not racing and whatever factor contributes for lack of racing, it gets blamed. Clear?Nomore wrote:The tyres are the same for everyone since 2007.
I really don't understand why people complain about tyres, if they really think that their favorite driver or car is loosing and the fault is on the tyres...then they have to think that when their favorite driver or car won it was all down to the tyres.
Stop complaining the tyres are the same for everyone, and for us fans 2,3,4,5 pitstop are better than 1 pit stop.
I don't think anyone's complaining that the driver has to deal with these variables to a a certain extent as that's just part of the sport, and what makes it so good in some ways. I believe that what people aren't quite so fond of is the degree to which these sensitive tyres are limiting the drivers. People aren't arguing that there should be no tyre conservation at all, but when Formula 1 is supposed to be the pinnacle of motor sport, it beggars belief that the drivers can't demonstrate their speed by having to consistently drive to a delta time.Nomore wrote:No clear not at all,prince wrote:If it was only degradation/grain, no one would have complained. When you design a car that can go 330kph+, but due to cheesy tyres, you compromise and underdrive the car, that's where the problem is. People watch F1 for flat out racing, not the dram of tyre endurance. That's not racing and whatever factor contributes for lack of racing, it gets blamed. Clear?Nomore wrote:The tyres are the same for everyone since 2007.
I really don't understand why people complain about tyres, if they really think that their favorite driver or car is loosing and the fault is on the tyres...then they have to think that when their favorite driver or car won it was all down to the tyres.
Stop complaining the tyres are the same for everyone, and for us fans 2,3,4,5 pitstop are better than 1 pit stop.
When a variable is the same for everyone for me it's fine.
When a variable it's not the same for everyone, then this is a problem.
If someone here can bring facts and proves that this variable is not the same for everyone, then i will complain for this variable.
This is just one more variable to the equation called Winning.
How to deal with this variable ?
This ia a engineering skill, driver skill, team skill. How a team will solve the equation called winning in a less time than the others when we have one more variable, or two or three on n more variables. This is formula 1, that's the way i see it at least.
In my job im asked to do also thinks that i wasn't supposed to do but i have to do them because the company asked me.
In the modern era of Formula 1 it's the same, the time when the driver had only to drive as fast as he can it's over...now a driver WILL have to drive as fast as he can but also to thinks about engine, mechanical parts, tyres, gear, strategy, fuel..etc ALL these are variables that the driver, the team and engineers have to deal with.
It is downgrading the sport, that's what's at stake here and you fail to see that.Nomore wrote:No clear not at all,prince wrote:If it was only degradation/grain, no one would have complained. When you design a car that can go 330kph+, but due to cheesy tyres, you compromise and underdrive the car, that's where the problem is. People watch F1 for flat out racing, not the dram of tyre endurance. That's not racing and whatever factor contributes for lack of racing, it gets blamed. Clear?Nomore wrote:The tyres are the same for everyone since 2007.
I really don't understand why people complain about tyres, if they really think that their favorite driver or car is loosing and the fault is on the tyres...then they have to think that when their favorite driver or car won it was all down to the tyres.
Stop complaining the tyres are the same for everyone, and for us fans 2,3,4,5 pitstop are better than 1 pit stop.
When a variable is the same for everyone for me it's fine.
When a variable it's not the same for everyone, then this is a problem.
If someone here can bring facts and proves that this variable is not the same for everyone, then i will complain for this variable.
This is just one more variable to the equation called Winning.
How to deal with this variable ?
This ia a engineering skill, driver skill, team skill. How a team will solve the equation called winning in a less time than the others when we have one more variable, or two or three on n more variables. This is formula 1, that's the way i see it at least.
In my job im asked to do also thinks that i wasn't supposed to do but i have to do them because the company asked me.
In the modern era of Formula 1 it's the same, the time when the driver had only to drive as fast as he can it's over...now a driver WILL have to drive as fast as he can but also to thinks about engine, mechanical parts, tyres, gear, strategy, fuel..etc ALL these are variables that the driver, the team and engineers have to deal with.