That's my point - in the 1 race where the two specs were both raced, the older spec outfinished the new spec.Blackout wrote:
Grosjean didnt have the new exhaust/ramp/tunnels spec in Sepang.
And this thread is about the car.
That's my point - in the 1 race where the two specs were both raced, the older spec outfinished the new spec.Blackout wrote:
Grosjean didnt have the new exhaust/ramp/tunnels spec in Sepang.
And this thread is about the car.
It didnt. Kimi on new spec qualified better then Grosjean on older spec. Kimi had problems in race (penalty 3 places, damaged front wing on start, and lousy strategy where he stucked infront slower cars) he was all weekend faster then Grosjean.raymondu999 wrote:That's my point - in the 1 race where the two specs were both raced, the older spec outfinished the new spec.Blackout wrote:
Grosjean didnt have the new exhaust/ramp/tunnels spec in Sepang.
And this thread is about the car.
The facts say it did. Qualified better does not equal finished better.Neno wrote:It didnt.raymondu999 wrote:the older spec outfinished the new spec.
But, (to my opinion) rather tellingly - he was very unhappy with the balance. He would suddenly get snap oversteer mid-corner, and constantly would go over the grass at the exit of 12.he was all weekend faster then Grosjean.
You can't on the basis of Malaysia say that the upgrades are a backwards step. Kimi had a penalty and contact fw damage into turn 2 on lap 1. Did you even watch the race? Clearly a step forward, if the weather holds out I think we will see another strong result this weekend.raymondu999 wrote:The facts say it did. Qualified better does not equal finished better.Neno wrote:It didnt.raymondu999 wrote:the older spec outfinished the new spec.
But, (to my opinion) rather tellingly - he was very unhappy with the balance. He would suddenly get snap oversteer mid-corner, and constantly would go over the grass at the exit of 12.he was all weekend faster then Grosjean.
But Grosjean said that his car was worse when he reverted to the old spec in FP2...raymondu999 wrote:That's my point - in the 1 race where the two specs were both raced, the older spec outfinished the new spec.Blackout wrote:
Grosjean didnt have the new exhaust/ramp/tunnels spec in Sepang.
And this thread is about the car.
Still believe RAI was more a victim of circumstance than a victim of a poor upgrade. I think we should at least wait until tomorrow to judge, assuming the race is fairly normal (no rain and a dry track throughout, no damages to the car, no penalties etc.). You also have to remember that towards the end when RAI passed HUL, both he and GRO posted good lap times, while also being able to conserve tyres pretty well.raymondu999 wrote:But, (to my opinion) rather tellingly - he was very unhappy with the balance. He would suddenly get snap oversteer mid-corner, and constantly would go over the grass at the exit of 12.
I'd bet that's the compressed air bottle – same location as it was when it took Heidfeld's car out.elFranZ wrote:Is this an hydraulic actuator (yellow circle)?
http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/6857/e21t.png
Thanks for your clarification. I'm reading speculations about Lotus' "FRIC" pointing to that object as the main actuator. But if I'm not wrong, a passive system doesn't need any actuator, and it should not be located down there.beelsebob wrote:I'd bet that's the compressed air bottle – same location as it was when it took Heidfeld's car out.elFranZ wrote:Is this an hydraulic actuator (yellow circle)?
http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/6857/e21t.png