marcush. wrote:But you correlate a modified experiment ,don´t you?
and
good luck ,I don´t buy it.It´s useless crap to me ,as is the flowwiz voodoo (where is the sense of applying a liquid to a surface and then go around a circuit at x speeds ,x-acceölerations and completly unpredictable influences ? I never saw any team actually video capturing their flowviz runs on track which would make it all a lot more worthwhile doing
That's exactly what I was wondering also (referring to both - the pitot arrays and the flow viz).
That massive grid will have significant effects upstream and will yet only measure individual (read fluctuating) data in a turbulent flow. So two effects that make me both wonder what you can really read from the results.
And for the flow- viz: For what speed do you want to determine the actual flow? I'm pretty sure that the local speed and direction in an area passed by a rotating vortex will change so much that at the end of one lap you only have a big mixture of traces. It might work if you want to identify if flow separation occurs under any circumstance at a given location but beyond that? I don't see how you could correlate certain elements of a flowviz trace with a certain speed or behaviour of the car in a certain condition !?