Development freeze ends, I think.Joie de vivre wrote:Are manufacturers able to change engine through years? As we know they can't change anything on current engines.
Toyota!? Really? Do we have a source for this...?ESPImperium wrote:
Renault (€20m-€24m a season) - Red Bull (Works), Toro Rosso, Caterham (Both with a Red Bull gearbox)
Mercedes (€15m-€18m a season) - Mercedes AMG (Works), Force India (Both with a Mercedes AMG gearbox)
Ferrari (€12m-€15m a season) - Scuderia Ferrari (Works), Marussia (Both with a Ferrari gearbox)
Honda (€14-€17m a season) - McLaren (Works), Lotus (Lotus Gearbox)
Toyota (€14m-€17m a season) - Williams (Works), Sauber (Williams Gearbox)
They will have started work on the engines already. If Honda did borrow Mercedes ideas ?Joie de vivre wrote:The thing that irritates me is the fact Honda is going to steal Mercedes's know-how and use it as a base for their engine.
WhiteBlue wrote:Porsche will come sooner or later.
How so? Please expand on this. Perhaps Porsche weren't paying attention.WhiteBlue wrote:The second problem is self correcting with the new concord rules and every new manufacturer coming into F1.
Of course, it's as simple as that. Maybe Todt should've implemented this strategy 3 years ago. Or maybe, more likely he applecart gets upset by changing things to favour 1 party instead of all.WhiteBlue wrote:All you have to do is.............
I believe it's already there.WhiteBlue wrote:F1 is on its way to become the true global motor racing series with a relevant showing in the Americas, Asia and Europe.
I thought IndyCars were V6 turbos.ringo wrote:To me Honda is over hyped.
I don't think they've the experience to make a better engine than the suppliers in the sport today.
Back in the 80's and early nineties was just that,.. back then.
They don't even have much experience with turbo engines relative to the suppliers we have currently. with the exception of Ferrari.
Also BTCC and WTCCAnon123 wrote:I thought IndyCars were V6 turbos.ringo wrote:To me Honda is over hyped.
I don't think they've the experience to make a better engine than the suppliers in the sport today.
Back in the 80's and early nineties was just that,.. back then.
They don't even have much experience with turbo engines relative to the suppliers we have currently. with the exception of Ferrari.
I was referring to production car, but good point. They do have turbo race engines.Anon123 wrote:I thought IndyCars were V6 turbos.ringo wrote:To me Honda is over hyped.
I don't think they've the experience to make a better engine than the suppliers in the sport today.
Back in the 80's and early nineties was just that,.. back then.
They don't even have much experience with turbo engines relative to the suppliers we have currently. with the exception of Ferrari.
The new power units are going to benefit from high efficiency. Honda has quite a bit of experience with producing efficient burning, high output engines. They also have quite a bit of experience with hybrid powertrains. Most of the Honda turbo work is on Kei cars that only Japan gets. Yes, they may not have as much experience with turbos as some of the other manufacturers, but the turbo is certainly not the only component in the power unit.ringo wrote:I was referring to production car, but good point. They do have turbo race engines.Anon123 wrote:I thought IndyCars were V6 turbos.ringo wrote:To me Honda is over hyped.
I don't think they've the experience to make a better engine than the suppliers in the sport today.
Back in the 80's and early nineties was just that,.. back then.
They don't even have much experience with turbo engines relative to the suppliers we have currently. with the exception of Ferrari.
However i feel there's going to be some dependency on production car know how, as it relates to efficiency from turbo engines.
However they've been out of formula 1 too long IMO for them to comeback better than who's already in the game.
Seems a shot in the foot. Only one team's data.turbof1 wrote:Honda engines exclusive for mclaren for atleast 2015:
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/107571
It also means they can focus all their engineering efforts on meeting that one team's needs.Shakeman wrote:Seems a shot in the foot. Only one team's data.