No indeed, monaco is the absolute best case for tyres:dren wrote:The Mercedes was lapping very slow during the race. They were able to control the pace and speed up if they needed. Part of this was likely due to strategy to keep the pack bunched up and protect them from cars trying to pit early and undercut. Part of it was to protect the tires. They -likely- could have gone faster and still pulled off a 1 stopper. With this in mind along with the fact that Monaco is not harsh on tires, we cannot conclude if the W04 has solved its tire issues.
The suspension upgrades on Hamilton's car might help, but I'm guessing it isn't the cure. It probably boils down to overall car design integration rather than one key area.
Which they showed last year aswellbeelsebob wrote:No indeed, monaco is the absolute best case for tyres:dren wrote:The Mercedes was lapping very slow during the race. They were able to control the pace and speed up if they needed. Part of this was likely due to strategy to keep the pack bunched up and protect them from cars trying to pit early and undercut. Part of it was to protect the tires. They -likely- could have gone faster and still pulled off a 1 stopper. With this in mind along with the fact that Monaco is not harsh on tires, we cannot conclude if the W04 has solved its tire issues.
The suspension upgrades on Hamilton's car might help, but I'm guessing it isn't the cure. It probably boils down to overall car design integration rather than one key area.
Shorter race distance means lower fuel load initially
Good balance between front and rear grip needed
No high speed turns
Shorter overall distance
Very unabrasive track surface
It was pretty much the perfect track for a car that's hard on it's tyres but otherwise quick.
beelsebob wrote:No indeed, monaco is the absolute best case for tyres:dren wrote:The Mercedes was lapping very slow during the race. They were able to control the pace and speed up if they needed. Part of this was likely due to strategy to keep the pack bunched up and protect them from cars trying to pit early and undercut. Part of it was to protect the tires. They -likely- could have gone faster and still pulled off a 1 stopper. With this in mind along with the fact that Monaco is not harsh on tires, we cannot conclude if the W04 has solved its tire issues.
The suspension upgrades on Hamilton's car might help, but I'm guessing it isn't the cure. It probably boils down to overall car design integration rather than one key area.
Shorter race distance means lower fuel load initially
Good balance between front and rear grip needed
No high speed turns
Shorter overall distance
Very unabrasive track surface
It was pretty much the perfect track for a car that's hard on it's tyres but otherwise quick.
That could just as well have been demotivational bluff towards the other teams.mantikos wrote: Well team radio said ROS had 60% of front and 50% of rear life on the tires he took off in his pit stop...so they seem to have addressed the issue significantly...esp when you compare this to RBR's team radio telling VET that his set of tires were marginal...so Merc has 60% left and RBR has 0% after about the same stint.
AnthonyG wrote:That could just as well have been demotivational bluff towards the other teams.mantikos wrote: Well team radio said ROS had 60% of front and 50% of rear life on the tires he took off in his pit stop...so they seem to have addressed the issue significantly...esp when you compare this to RBR's team radio telling VET that his set of tires were marginal...so Merc has 60% left and RBR has 0% after about the same stint.
I might be wrong but Rosberg was actually one of the only cars to put on used tires at that point so I think the 60%/50% was about the tires that had just been put on his carAnthonyG wrote:That could just as well have been demotivational bluff towards the other teams.mantikos wrote: Well team radio said ROS had 60% of front and 50% of rear life on the tires he took off in his pit stop...so they seem to have addressed the issue significantly...esp when you compare this to RBR's team radio telling VET that his set of tires were marginal...so Merc has 60% left and RBR has 0% after about the same stint.
SamH123 wrote:I might be wrong but Rosberg was actually one of the only cars to put on used tires at that point so I think the 60%/50% was about the tires that had just been put on his carAnthonyG wrote:That could just as well have been demotivational bluff towards the other teams.mantikos wrote: Well team radio said ROS had 60% of front and 50% of rear life on the tires he took off in his pit stop...so they seem to have addressed the issue significantly...esp when you compare this to RBR's team radio telling VET that his set of tires were marginal...so Merc has 60% left and RBR has 0% after about the same stint.
mantikos wrote:AnthonyG wrote:I might be wrong but Rosberg was actually one of the only cars to put on used tires at that point so I think the 60%/50% was about the tires that had just been put on his carmantikos wrote:
That could just as well have been demotivational bluff towards the other teams.
Negative, you can read the transcripts for both ROS and VET it clearly implies that the set he took off had 60% rears and 50% front left remaining...which is what RBR communicated to VET...'ROS is not marginal at all on tires, he can push, you need to gap since we are wear limited and can't push since we have to make this set last till the end'
Also, other had scrubbed tires too
Mercedes Spy™ @MercedesAMGSpy 1hdren wrote:Sounds like Mercedes is testing at Silverstone today. Anyone have any pics?
That is a W02. Why would they use that car?Mika1 wrote:Mercedes Spy™ @MercedesAMGSpy 1hdren wrote:Sounds like Mercedes is testing at Silverstone today. Anyone have any pics?
Mercedes testing at Silverstone: http://s10.postimg.org/3xoz2sbdl/Oude_a ... tlaten.jpg … (today) #F1 #Mercedes