I think on both, but I'm not sure.Ferraripilot wrote:Is that just on Lewis' car again?
Kiril Varbanov wrote:Indeed, looks like a tungsten steel ballast - the estimated weight of this piece is about 8 to 10 kilograms.mantikos wrote:ballast weight - kept low for lower CoG
atanatizante wrote:http://i.imgur.com/fMkSB3w.jpgKiril Varbanov wrote:Indeed, looks like a tungsten steel ballast - the estimated weight of this piece is about 8 to 10 kilograms.mantikos wrote:ballast weight - kept low for lower CoG
Which one? Red or green arrow?
I too can't see anything. Even slight differences. It appears as though the only modification was the new engine cover.Ferraripilot wrote:I'm not quite seeing different side pods or any alterations to the exhaust, can anyone point this out a bit more clearly if that is indeed the case?
although I was aware that MGB have changed the pad material this year because last year's didn't allow lewis to use his normal technique of stamping on the brakes ultra late , and that nico has decided to change to that as well , I didn't realise that some teams have exclusives on the material they use so that it can't be offered to their competitionmonsi wrote:Lewis's column on the BBC site is describing his braking issues http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/22809074. I'd be surprised if Mercedes was not working on that, if only because the way he describes it as a loss of 0.3s in the first sector of Monaco is three times the scale of the improvement estimated above. What do people think are the options that might be appropriate ? Are 'simple' measures like tyre conditioning or blanket temperatures feasible, or is it all much more complicated than that ?
also mercedes is monitoring tyre temperature like Ferrari?
Tobias Grüner wrote: Mercedes AMG running new front brake ducts without the extra duct on the inside they had yesterday