What exactly makes you say that on two occasions Lotus didn't waste a chance to fight for a win and wouldn't have been able to challenge RB? Two factors already mentioned:ringo wrote:Well RG was a better driver in this race than Kimi. I don't think you can say he couldnt pass because he's no good.abw wrote:RG couldn't pass SV because he's not as good a driver, his car's not as good, and he was on the same tires. My thinking is that if KR had been waved past RG as soon as he'd caught up, he'd have been on fresher options when he caught SV and had a few more opportunities for a (lame but effective) DRS pass. Again, this is all speculation in hindsight. I don't fault Lotus for making the call they made at that point (I do fault them for some calls earlier in the race). Regardless, it's a good result for SV, and a decent result for KR, and RG. I thought it was fun to watch.
None of them stood a chance. The redbull's potential was being hindered by the tyres from the start of the season.
If you put better tyres on it, then more of the potential will be revealed.
- first stint when faster driver was held up losing time on softs, being close and possibly in front of Vettel was possible
- second time choosing right strategy for a driver who was slower on softs and horrible for a second driver:
And from spinmasters at work: (http://pitpass.com/49483-German-GP-Race-notes-Lotus):
"We expected slightly more performance from his final set of soft tyres, but he was right with Seb at the end." - understatement of the century. I said it already many times. My translation: we knew what kind of advantage softs gave, we knew what pace mediums had after we used one of our drivers as a guinea pig for tyres (very early stop, this one is debatable), we were counting for a win, Raikkonen didn't have the pace.
"The redbull's potential was being hindered by the tyres from the start of the season." There's little to back this blanket statement up and anyway it's meaningless to discussion about this particular race. My answer: if they can perform well now using the same tyres, tyres weren't the factor that was limiting them in the first place. Simple.
Judged by time measuring machines Lotus had every chance to at least fight for the win here. About KERS problems (I don't know how long it lasted), yes it was a factor but circumstances like starting from the pole, running in free air, not having to deal with Rosberg or Hamilton were also factors.
More from here http://pitpass.com/49483-German-GP-Race-notes-Lotus and earlier:
E.B.: "They are racing each other to the point where they are not holding up the other one [..]" - Outright lie, see first stop on softs and Raikkonen holding Grosjean
"Kimi was held up by Lewis [Hamilton] after his first pit stop" - meaningless repeated, fact of the century, What did it matter when it was only a safety car that bailed you out, gap was bigger than lost time anyway. Vettel and Grosjean were held after third pitstop.
May I add omissions of the century:
"We robbed Grosjean (and ourselves) of a victory (or a chance for victory)"
"We gifted Red Bull a win"