Lotus E21 Renault

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
User avatar
theWPTformula
50
Joined: 28 Jul 2013, 22:36
Location: UK

Re: Lotus E21 Renault

Post

I've heard the the FIA wanted Lotus to try them for visibility purposes during the race, so Lotus had no choice in running them. Whether they have them after the summer break is a different matter, but I doubt they will be the best choice aerodynamically, even if the article in the homepage says so.

User avatar
Paul
11
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 19:33

Re: Lotus E21 Renault

Post

That would be far too magnanimous by Lotus to test them in the race for FIA, and I'm not sure FIA are able to pick just one team like that and force them to, so there should be an advantage Lotus see...

Huntresa
Huntresa
54
Joined: 03 Dec 2011, 11:33

Re: Lotus E21 Renault

Post

well we had the FIA linked earlier this weekend in the thread.

User avatar
theWPTformula
50
Joined: 28 Jul 2013, 22:36
Location: UK

Re: Lotus E21 Renault

Post

If they're on after the summer break then we will know... It's an interesting development if it is of Lotus's own doing, very rare to see the mirror housing itself get attention. More often the mirror stalks that are changed but I suppose every team is looking at the very fine details now.

Kansas
Kansas
-3
Joined: 01 Feb 2013, 03:53

Re: Lotus E21 Renault

Post

Guys, what's the difference between new and old exhaust???

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: Lotus E21 Renault

Post

theWPTformula wrote:If they're on after the summer break then we will know... It's an interesting development if it is of Lotus's own doing, very rare to see the mirror housing itself get attention. More often the mirror stalks that are changed but I suppose every team is looking at the very fine details now.
It is something they can use next year. I doubt it'll bring anything significant, but if they find 20-30 of such little things it does add up.
#AeroFrodo

User avatar
zoro_f1
-2
Joined: 02 Feb 2012, 08:24

Re: Lotus E21 Renault

Post

Image
Image “The force can have a strong influence on the weak-minded”: [Obi Wan Kenobi]

User avatar
SectorOne
166
Joined: 26 May 2013, 09:51

Re: Lotus E21 Renault

Post

theWPTformula wrote:I've heard the the FIA wanted Lotus to try them for visibility purposes during the race, so Lotus had no choice in running them. Whether they have them after the summer break is a different matter, but I doubt they will be the best choice aerodynamically, even if the article in the homepage says so.
This was what i heard as well. Testing for 2014,
"If the only thing keeping a person decent is the expectation of divine reward, then brother that person is a piece of sh*t"

User avatar
FrukostScones
162
Joined: 25 May 2010, 17:41
Location: European Union

Re: Lotus E21 Renault

Post

Lotus E21 LWB in the making: AMuS says 10cm extra of wheelbase from Spa on

http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/form ... 12849.html

http://www.microsofttranslator.com/bv.a ... 12849.html
Finishing races is important, but racing is more important.

User avatar
lio007
316
Joined: 28 Jan 2013, 23:03
Location: Austria

Re: Lotus E21 Renault

Post

FrukostScones wrote:Lotus E21 LWB in the making: AMuS says 10cm extra of wheelbase from Spa on

http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/form ... 12849.html

http://www.microsofttranslator.com/bv.a ... 12849.html
the article says that they had to do two crashtests.

does anybody know, if they can use both type of chassis in one race e.g. RAI the new one and GRO the old one?
do they need another crashtest if they revert to the old chassis...but IMO this doesn't make any sense.

Kansas
Kansas
-3
Joined: 01 Feb 2013, 03:53

Re: Lotus E21 Renault

Post

lio007 wrote:
FrukostScones wrote:Lotus E21 LWB in the making: AMuS says 10cm extra of wheelbase from Spa on

http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/form ... 12849.html

http://www.microsofttranslator.com/bv.a ... 12849.html
the article says that they had to do two crashtests.

does anybody know, if they can use both type of chassis in one race e.g. RAI the new one and GRO the old one?
do they need another crashtest if they revert to the old chassis...but IMO this doesn't make any sense.
not that i aware of.

They would swap in btw races like singapore and suzuka. Shorter wb would be use in narrow street races while the longer one on wider circuit. It reminds me of F2007 that suffer on narrow circuit as ferrari opted for longer wheelbase.

stefan_
stefan_
696
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 12:43
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Re: Lotus E21 Renault

Post

The article says that if they opt for that solution the would have to pass a crash test, not that they already had. I don't know about this, a longer wheelbase means a new (longer) chassis and a new chassis means a pretty much new car with different aero, mechanical benaviour, etc.
"...and there, very much in flames, is Jacques Laffite's Ligier. That's obviously a turbo blaze, and of course, Laffite will be able to see that conflagration in his mirrors... he is coolly parking the car somewhere safe." Murray Walker, San Marino 1985

User avatar
Tim.Wright
330
Joined: 13 Feb 2009, 06:29

Re: Lotus E21 Renault

Post

stefan_ wrote:The article says that if they opt for that solution the would have to pass a crash test, not that they already had. I don't know about this, a longer wheelbase means a new (longer) chassis and a new chassis means a pretty much new car with different aero, mechanical benaviour, etc.
A longer wheel doesn't necessarily mean a new chassis. You only need to change the wishbones to sweep forward or back a little bit more. I believe this is what Mercedes did a coule of years ago when they lengthened their wheelbase mid season.
Not the engineer at Force India

User avatar
FrukostScones
162
Joined: 25 May 2010, 17:41
Location: European Union

Re: Lotus E21 Renault

Post

Tim.Wright wrote:
stefan_ wrote:The article says that if they opt for that solution the would have to pass a crash test, not that they already had. I don't know about this, a longer wheelbase means a new (longer) chassis and a new chassis means a pretty much new car with different aero, mechanical benaviour, etc.
A longer wheel doesn't necessarily mean a new chassis. You only need to change the wishbones to sweep forward or back a little bit more. I believe this is what Mercedes did a coule of years ago when they lengthened their wheelbase mid season.

the article says (in translated garbled English):
A longer wheelbase means longer nose
Lotus has yet a further coup in the hindquarters. The wheelbase of the E21 should be extended to ten centimeters. And (meant is at the front) front. Because is it pushes forward the front axle by a different angle of the Wishbone, Lotus needs also a new, longer nose. Thus, the distance between the front wing and front tyre is maintained. This procedure requires two new crash tests. The dynamic front from the front and the so-called go from test side. While a hydraulic punch presses with a force of 4,000 Newton from the side towards the nose to determine at what strength she cancels. The nose must withstand over 30 seconds to a weight of 400 kg without any structural damage occur.
so new crash tests only for the nose
Finishing races is important, but racing is more important.

endless
endless
0
Joined: 03 Jul 2010, 09:17

Re: Lotus E21 Renault

Post

Tim.Wright wrote:
stefan_ wrote:...I believe this is what Mercedes did a coule of years ago when they lengthened their wheelbase mid season.
Indeed : http://scarbsf1.com/blog1/2010/04/28/me ... edictions/