
via Sutton

via Sutton
I think this timing session did not show the true pace of the cars, Ferrari were timing their last lap pretty badly, I mean they were out too early.donskar wrote:Alonso hoped that the break would somehow produce positive results. Starting 9th and 10th must be quite disappointing. Unless we see a miracle tomorrow, IMHO it's time to think about next year's car.
sucof wrote:I think this timing session did not show the true pace of the cars, Ferrari were timing their last lap pretty badly, I mean they were out too early.donskar wrote:Alonso hoped that the break would somehow produce positive results. Starting 9th and 10th must be quite disappointing. Unless we see a miracle tomorrow, IMHO it's time to think about next year's car.
yeah, it's easy to say anything in hindsightRedragon wrote:sucof wrote:I think this timing session did not show the true pace of the cars, Ferrari were timing their last lap pretty badly, I mean they were out too early.donskar wrote:Alonso hoped that the break would somehow produce positive results. Starting 9th and 10th must be quite disappointing. Unless we see a miracle tomorrow, IMHO it's time to think about next year's car.
I think in a qualifying of this characteristics it is unfair to blame teams about their outcome as it is more about luck. Yes they could have a bit later but maybe the rain would have increased, yes they could have go with inters from the first lap as Force india did and be in better position. None, knew exactly the outcome. Some gave the Pole to Diresta. The only thing to blame here it is luck and luck is not on Ferrari and Lotus side this time
The post containing that images said SILVERSTONE above it. That wing was only tried in SilverstoneAlonso Fan wrote:ok maybe they're not running them herewesley123 wrote:what r-wings?Alonso Fan wrote:is the front wing new?
i've not seen the r wings before
http://img2.auto-motor-und-sport.de/Fer ... 698727.jpg
I think he had a problem with "stalling the diffuser" bit. Aero sensitivity to pitch and yaw and often inverse relationship between peak downforce (the more the better) and aero sensitivity (the less the better) is age long dilemma.Crucial_Xtreme wrote:Even though @Aero_A's take on what could be/probably happening wasn't good enough for Ringo because it wasn't an academic paper, Aero_A is still an active F1 Aerodynamicist and it seems he was indeed spot on.
Redragon wrote:sucof wrote:I think this timing session did not show the true pace of the cars, Ferrari were timing their last lap pretty badly, I mean they were out too early.donskar wrote:Alonso hoped that the break would somehow produce positive results. Starting 9th and 10th must be quite disappointing. Unless we see a miracle tomorrow, IMHO it's time to think about next year's car.
I think in a qualifying of this characteristics it is unfair to blame teams about their outcome as it is more about luck. Yes they could have a bit later but maybe the rain would have increased, yes they could have go with inters from the first lap as Force india did and be in better position. None, knew exactly the outcome. Some gave the Pole to Diresta. The only thing to blame here it is luck and luck is not on Ferrari and Lotus side this time