beelsebob wrote:Nice, that shot of pastor's front tyre actually did a lovely job of demonstrating why dirt and pickup has such a large effect on grip for a while. Not necessarily because of adding bumps to the nice smooth rubber, but adding patches of cold to it.
Which shot?
rssh wrote:Why would it return for Singapore isn't a short-wheelbase better for Singapore's twisty track?
It's not enough to make any difference in terms of turning circle and "agility" - F1 wheelbases are long anyways. It will have far greater effects on the car's vehicle dynamics in terms of weight transfer (as the axles are further apart) as well as aerodynamics, because there is now more distance for the car to work the air.
Juzh wrote:
That's strange imo and it shows they lack confidence they had in 2011. Higher gears means they think they will have to overtake. It also mean you will loose some ultimate free air pace. This race is still wide open.
The short-gear strategy works in Monza if you get pole - because poleman is generally quickest anyways, so it doesn't matter where in the lap you get the laptime. Perhaps its a sign that they believe Merc is still better in the pole position stakes.
What interests me more is their DRS-closed top speed. In 2011 and 2012, Red Bull geared their top speed for DRS-closed, ie DRS only gives them an acceleration boost, and not a top speed boost, meaning they gained less than other teams. See how qualifying in 2011 Monza was closer than it was in the race for Vettel (the McMercs were close, until both drivers botched their second runs with lockups into the second chicane)