Measuring exact pitstop times.SectorOne wrote:Why are they doing this? Finding gaps in traffic?
I remembering thinking the same thing earlier in the year and they disappointed me and tried to stretch out the first stints. I remember thinking WTF? they're losing time. I think they were just trying to have a long first stint so they were sure the last set didn't run out of grip. But really doesn't the track surface rubber in a lot at the end of the race compared to beginning and your tyres can last longer. And the fuel load effect. I would push hard in the beginning get the first stint out of the way and worry about tyre preserving at the end. I could be wrong but does anyone else think these teams are so big they overlook these small details.Racer X wrote:Kimis Feed back is legendary. I'm responding to the video above.
Hey could Mercedez me planning to do multiple stops not going for 2-3 stops but maybe 3-4 shooting for that qualifying speed and just going for an all out attack strategy quickly coming in to change tyres as soon as the times drop'? Maybe aiming at setting the fastest times consistently. With both cars always on fast tires never worrying about tire life? I think the quality of Both Merc drivers is good enough to do that.
So the front row means no quali speed and a good friday even worse race pace? Where exactly are you drawing your statements from?Racer X wrote:I was not expecting Gutierrez to make Q3.
Or Perez to beat Button because of how Jenson had the Korea Update and Perez has the same car ran in the Singapore GP.
The Force Indias loosing speed and not into Q3 while both Saubers go up. I like this GP so far also Mercedez no quali speed.... maybe even a worse race pace. Wow could Hulk get a podium. With all this im looking at him to shine. Vettel to win it.