Let's not forget bringing a guy (Lauda) who helped to sink (while collecting a multi-million dollar payout) the last F1 team he was involved in. Lauda Air ceased operations in July of this year which may not really mean much of anything...other than he has more time on his hands...marcush. wrote:Mercedes AMG Petronas have adopted the modus operandi of their mothership more or less .
You need a new car every year and break down the work necessary to achieve it .with the task ahead you will soon realise it does not fit into any of your plans to have the same guys do all the work every year as inevitably you would need to split your focus between current and future car too much so both campaigns will suffer.
As a countermeasure you divide the car design and development into PRE development and Series development .This will allow you to have the guys conceptualising the layout , scrape every info from the regs and prepare the envelope within you will have to work later .
At a certain point you will face a design freeze -every major dicision is taken and set in stone more or less -e.g supplier of the engine is a given - and decision on push or pullrod or new mold techiques are validated and proof of concept has been done and signed of by the directors.
This is when detailing starts and Costas guys do all the bits and pieces .
It´s not Costa does one car and willis or lowe the other .
It´s Willis does the Prototype work ,Costa does make it a workable design and Lowe is moving it into a campaign .Fairly logic -not too revolutionary ,but a steady progress.
In essence we see the 2012 concept car in service this year ....when did willis actually join? end of 2011 ? it does make a fit .
I personally do not think Mercedes AMG Petronas Grand Prix does face any more flak than they deserve.they have improved ,no question -but hey look at the stream of blood and moneys that went down the drain -coming from a double championship team sold as the team to beat in 2009 .I stand to my words -this was the biggest stunt performed for a long time in Formula 1 to sell a core of people as the best idea since sliced bread ,get the money for the sale plus get money for running the whole lot and getting a vote of confidence after admittting it is a heap of crap and we need another 4 TDs and a few hunderd millíons to make a proper team from the mess Daimler has aquired....
=D> =D> =D>
I´m still impressed.
wrong thread here -but you sure see the difference?FoxHound wrote:Hmmm
Marcush,
Did the sale of sauber to bmw, and back to sauber not net peter a tidy profit?
What is their management structure like?
And what of their current plight in having to get russian teenage pay drivers to make ends meet?
I skimmed through the thread (sauber team) and didn't see much from you regards these issues.
Why hold these things against one team but not judge other teams according to your own well versed yardstick?
I think it went more like this,marcush. wrote:I cannot see your issues with Peter Sauber to be honest.He bought back the team ,saved it from extinction ,restructured and arranged his own replacement -as far as I know with no financial benefit to himself.
Sauber has essentially been on the grid for 20 years now. He did everything he could to keep the team afloat...Brawn kept it afloat with the bare minimum just to turn around and flip it on Mercedes. Had the car been properly developed in 2009, perhaps MGP might not have wasted 3 seasons on the grid achieving nothing, no? Even with 2013 seeing multiple wins, I'm not entirely convinced about what lies ahead in 2014 and beyond.FoxHound wrote:So mercedes bank rolled sauber in the early days.
Who would say no to such a gift you say.
Brawn inherits the honda team.
You want him to decline this gift?
Do you see the parallels?
Im not judging Mr Sauber. He stole nothing, and inherited alot from the link with mercedes.
I agree Fox, but Brawn already had Haug on the hook and finally caught the big fish, catch-and-release? Don't think so...FoxHound wrote: ...
Sauber made layoffs to survive, and brawn made layoffs to make a quick buck?