A shameless image thread for the enginephiles

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
Richard
Richard
Moderator
Joined: 15 Apr 2009, 14:41
Location: UK

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Post

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diesel_engine#History
At Augsburg, on August 10, 1893, Rudolf Diesel's prime model, a single 10-foot (3.0 m) iron cylinder with a flywheel at its base, ran on its own power for the first time. Diesel spent two more years making improvements and in 1896 demonstrated another model with a theoretical efficiency of 75%

Tommy Cookers
Tommy Cookers
638
Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 16:55

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Post

Ackroyd Stuart seems to have made a real 'diesel' engine before Diesel did
but as AS's company were already in large-scale production of his hot-bulb engine, they didn't see any need for change
hundreds of thousands of these cheap and simple hot-bulb engines (otherwise known as semi-diesels) were made after Diesel

all engines have rights, don't they !
Last edited by Tommy Cookers on 27 Nov 2013, 11:26, edited 1 time in total.

zonk
zonk
69
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 00:56

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Post

who said diesel is soulless?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbNWcog2gx4[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcDHdhn4Rgc[/youtube]

Image

Blanchimont
Blanchimont
214
Joined: 09 Nov 2012, 23:47

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Post

richard_leeds wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diesel_engine#History
At Augsburg, on August 10, 1893, Rudolf Diesel's prime model, a single 10-foot (3.0 m) iron cylinder with a flywheel at its base, ran on its own power for the first time. Diesel spent two more years making improvements and in 1896 demonstrated another model with a theoretical efficiency of 75%
It says theoretical efficiency of 75%.
The overall measured efficiency in 1897 was 26,2%! Not that bad, i would say.

http://www.deutsches-museum.de/sammlung ... otor-1897/
Dear FIA, if you read this, please pm me for a redesign of the Technical Regulations to avoid finger nose shapes for 2016! :-)

Cold Fussion
Cold Fussion
93
Joined: 19 Dec 2010, 04:51

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Post

Can the theoretical thermal efficiency even reach 75%? I thought the limits of the diesel and otto cycle was ~60% efficiency.

Tommy Cookers
Tommy Cookers
638
Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 16:55

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Post

is that the 'true' Diesel cycle (heat added at constant volume) that could not be made to work by Diesel or anyone ?
or the Diesel cycle that Diesel used and diesel engines still use by design or accident (heat added at constant pressure or nearly so) ?

User avatar
FoxHound
55
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 16:50

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Post

richard_leeds wrote:Especially for foxhound, this is where it all began.

Engineers will appreciate the 75% thermal efficiency.

Other forums are available for vroom-vroom fanboys
Some high grade moderation there richard. Real quality stuff, top notch.
JET set

zonk
zonk
69
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 00:56

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Post

Pipe porn six cylinder two stroke Kohler engine originally meant for a military drone!

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

User avatar
FoxHound
55
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 16:50

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Post

Nice find Zonk.

Found a video to go with the pictures.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5svXFNmM5cU[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CR7E-D7i0m0[/youtube]
JET set

User avatar
flynfrog
Moderator
Joined: 23 Mar 2006, 22:31

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Post


shut up and take my money. I have always wanted to build a mercury optimax V6 Locost

Image

Image

Admittedly not a pretty engine but V6 two stroke

User avatar
andylaurence
123
Joined: 19 Jul 2011, 15:35

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Post

I was involved in a project to use a V8 Evinrude two-stroke engine in the back of a sprint/hillclimb car a couple of years ago. I've heard nothing of it recently, so I suspect it's run out of budget. The engine weighed just 80kg and could put out 500bhp, yet cost peanuts to buy. The plan was to run it with a dual CVT system and no differential. 8 silencers helped offset the low weight!

zonk
zonk
69
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 00:56

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Post

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRKeuHyI0lw[/youtube]

if an V8 isn't enough - supercharge it!!!

Image
Image
Image

xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Post

We have had images of the world's smallest V12 on the forum before, but this 12 cc pushrod is so cool;
Image

Image
Last edited by xpensive on 27 Nov 2013, 18:51, edited 3 times in total.
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"

User avatar
FW17
169
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Post

flynfrog wrote:

shut up and take my money. I have always wanted to build a mercury optimax V6 Locost

http://dazusfb7pt2uv.cloudfront.net/aca ... YP606R.jpg

http://outboardpowerheads.com/813043R97.jpg

Admittedly not a pretty engine but V6 two stroke
Always been fascinated by 2 stroke, always thought their abandonment was more political than anything else

On that mercury 2 stroke how is the exhaust routed?

Their block has such high bore (almost like an f1 engine)
Image

Here is a link to a Lola fitted with Mercury F1 V6
http://www.lolaheritage.co.uk/history/r ... 294_01.htm
Image

Sombrero
Sombrero
126
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 20:18

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Post