Dam that is ugly.
I applaud them though, they must have felt this was the best solution and they went with it regardless of how it looks. I don't think many other teams would have done that.
I think that nose could work very well too.
Time for the annual reminder that the car threads are for examining the actual features of the car. If the comment doesn’t relate to an observation of an actual detail on the car then it doesn’t belong in this thread.
For the avoidance of doubt, here are some examples:
Whitmarsh, Vettel, and Boullier are not features on any car.
References to laptimes belong in the relevant test or race thread.
Seriously, there is nothing new to say about genitals, gaping fish, or monkeys with big noses. It’s all been said already. We don’t need endless reminders.
Soft focus effects belong in wedding albums, not technical posts.
“I love this team” or “the TP must be sacked” are fanboy posts
Links to a blog are OK as long if you make constructive objective posts here. Otherwise its just spam.
Finally, if you do see posts that are out of order then please report them so they can be dealt with appropriately.
Maybe it will create some lift but the idea is that this solution helps the rear aerodynamic (downforce).el-Magico wrote:Is this nose not going to create lift?
I can't believe that actually made it out of concept stage as it's utterly offensive to the eyes!
If there is a front wing failure at high speed, the nose might just take off.el-Magico wrote:Is this nose not going to create lift?
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!