Is similar to the system Pagani Huayra?
EDIT: aerodynamic brake?
Are you referring to the rear flaps?idfx wrote:Is similar to the system Pagani Huayra?
http://www.themotorreport.com.au/conten ... 80x514.jpg
Yes.JDC123 wrote:Are you referring to the rear flaps?idfx wrote:Is similar to the system Pagani Huayra?
http://www.themotorreport.com.au/conten ... 80x514.jpg
He never said they had to, he said they would have, because it's good sense. They did exactly the same thing with the f-duct.n smikle wrote:Nope, they don't have to.. there is nothing stopping them from designing the car with it and testing it.Alexgtt wrote:McLaren would have run this past the FIA so debate on legality is pointless until the FIA ban it or someone protests the ruling. Following on from that McLaren would not run something the FIA hasn't OK'd.
Mind you, that doesn't rule out the FIA moving the goalposts........usually after a team or teams jumps up and down hard enough because they didn't think of it first.
So let's just focus on the technical debate because I'm fascinated to know more.
Apart from the rear mounting point of the suspension arms. That's not going to be quick to replicate.n smikle wrote:It can see this thing being copied by other teams before even the first race. It ain't too hard to implement.
Pup wrote:Added bonus is that the suspension will act as a fairly effective rear bumper, an obvious reaction to Maldonado's return to the midfield.
Not really, the pagani is active aerodynamics. It reacts to wheel speed, yaw and alot of electronics.idfx wrote:Is similar to the system Pagani Huayra?
http://www.themotorreport.com.au/conten ... 80x514.jpg
EDIT: aerodynamic brake?
According to his tweets, McLaren are apparently calling this a "mushroom" suspension.f1rules wrote:i know he is pro mclaren, but darren heaths twitter is pretty interesting