http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yft5spg9gQQ#t=0
like this.
ahahha
It sounds like tuner car escaped from the fast and the furious. Love it!charlex wrote:ahahha
but man...superb sound! super awesome acceleration fantastic video
I was thinking something totally different. Makes sense! Thanks.SchumacherM wrote:Snap oversteer/loss of rear grip/general lack of rear grip.ecapox wrote:What does "giving up at the rear" mean?
If it wasn't a big deal teams wouldn't put so much effort into Blanchimont noses or Sabretooth noses. Of course it's an important area.Chuckjr wrote:“The reason for that is the nose rules allow quite a lot of geometrical freedom. So you go off exploring that freedom. The reason there isn’t a single solution is it’s not actually that sensitive an area so there’s lots and lots of different solutions that work." --James Allison, Ferrari.
So according to one of the most respected engineers in the F1 paddock, all this differentiation between noses is actually not that big of a deal...?
Looking at that side view, this year's car looks so much better to my eyes...shame it looks so weird at the front from most every other angle!!
do they need some tuning regarding brake-by-wire?
Possible too.Frafer wrote:do they need some tuning regarding brake-by-wire?