andrewf1 wrote:GA never fails to criticize Ferrari for something, without thinking twice about it. He immediately comes to the conclusion that Ferrari's nose is wrong and that they haven't looked into the 'grey areas'. Talk about narrow minded, inflexible point of views and bias.
Completely agree. and this too:
"It will be difficult for [James Allison] to stamp his authority on the 2014 car... but if things dont go well at Ferrari I can see an implosion."
Negative much? Besides, there is almost always a reshuffle in a team in formula 1 teams when "things don't go well". Unnecessary to use the word implosion. He really gives away his subjectivity.
Where is Martin Whitmarsh from his beloved McLaren after last seasons disastrous results? hmm? it happens. Even in teams with like mclaren who had no serious shakeups.
I really dont even think he is as informative as Scarbs for example. Reason being GA gives his opinion. Scarbs listens to different pitlane peoples' opinions and gives you the general consensus.
And Scarbs maintains objectivity.
Anyway, Rant over.
I really dont think the nose is as contradictory as everyone is saying. the tub is still very high, and we saw from the flovis, it goes round the first part of the nose, not up and over.
A wise man once told me you cant polish a turd...