Red Bull RB10 Renault

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Crabbia
Crabbia
9
Joined: 13 Jun 2006, 22:39
Location: ZA

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

My two cents...

I dont think this was a design error by the redbull team and i dont think the Renault engine is or will be terrible. it may run a little hotter than the MB or ferrari, but that alone is not what i think happened to RB.

i think what happened is there was a mis-communication from Renault to the teams about the heat requirements needed for the ES. We aren't talking about simple one dimensional numbers here. Renault wont say to the team, you need to dissipate X amount of joules in heat per second. This information would be complex mathematical models of how and when and where on the ES the heat builds up. Possibly Renault didn't report correctly ( or its report wasn't understood correctly) on concentrated "hot spots" on the surface of the ES or other components.

TL/DR: the communication between Renault and its teams created the heat and the engine mapping issues.

one thing to note though:
The RB1 and RB2 had a ferrari engine. They moved to Renault power for the RB3. One of the reasons for the change, mentioned at the time, was that the RS27 was a cooler running engine than it's Ferrari contemporary, and this allowed the design team and Newey to be far more aggressive with packaging and bodywork. They do not have the cooling advantage, it seems, with the new PU.
A wise man once told me you cant polish a turd...

hollowBallistix
hollowBallistix
2
Joined: 13 Mar 2011, 18:36

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

In fact they used the Cosworth Engine in the RB1 in 2005

The RB2 switched to the Ferrari power unit, then the RB3, which was the 1st Newey Red Bull used Renault power unit, having passed the Ferrari contract onto the Toro Rosso team.

What is their contract situation now with Renault ? if for example they find that the packaging & cooling for the Mercedes or Ferrari power unit better suits Newey's design philosophy...how soon could they switch ?

Crabbia
Crabbia
9
Joined: 13 Jun 2006, 22:39
Location: ZA

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

hollowBallistix wrote:In fact they used the Cosworth Engine in the RB1 in 2005
Sorry, you're right, thanks for the correction.
A wise man once told me you cant polish a turd...

User avatar
rscsr
51
Joined: 19 Feb 2012, 13:02
Location: Austria

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

hollowBallistix wrote:In fact they used the Cosworth Engine in the RB1 in 2005

The RB2 switched to the Ferrari power unit, then the RB3, which was the 1st Newey Red Bull used Renault power unit, having passed the Ferrari contract onto the Toro Rosso team.

What is their contract situation now with Renault ? if for example they find that the packaging & cooling for the Mercedes or Ferrari power unit better suits Newey's design philosophy...how soon could they switch ?
I guess this wouldn't be feasible. Red Bull is now the works team for Renault and their main Sponsor is Infinity, which is owned by Nissan, where Renault holds 43% according to Wikipedia.

onewingedangel
onewingedangel
1
Joined: 12 Mar 2011, 02:05

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

Not to mention Mercedes and Ferrari and to a lesser extent Honda are not going to want their works teams shown up by a Red Bull.

If the Renault engine proves a dud and their relationship breaks down I bet Red Bull will be making enquiries with Nissan, and if unsucessful then VW, BMW, Ford, Jaguar etc. about co-financing a new engine.

hollowBallistix
hollowBallistix
2
Joined: 13 Mar 2011, 18:36

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

rscsr wrote:
hollowBallistix wrote:In fact they used the Cosworth Engine in the RB1 in 2005

The RB2 switched to the Ferrari power unit, then the RB3, which was the 1st Newey Red Bull used Renault power unit, having passed the Ferrari contract onto the Toro Rosso team.

What is their contract situation now with Renault ? if for example they find that the packaging & cooling for the Mercedes or Ferrari power unit better suits Newey's design philosophy...how soon could they switch ?
I guess this wouldn't be feasible. Red Bull is now the works team for Renault and their main Sponsor is Infinity, which is owned by Nissan, where Renault holds 43% according to Wikipedia.
Hmmm, well they off loaded the Ferrari contract onto the Toro Rosso team so they could use a better engine that suited Newey's design style, I'm just surprised at the issues they had with the Renault lump, surely they would have known that they would wrap the bodywork as tight as possible, so this would have been one of the key design factors for Renault when developing the engine.

Now if Renault haven't managed that, and indeed it's going to compromise the designs that have lead Red Bull to be successful, then I can't see why they wouldn't switch to a different engine supplier.

Anyway, lets see how they do in the next tests scheduled, and I guess we won't really know where anyone stands until the first qualifying session for outright pace & reliability then in the race.

prince
prince
6
Joined: 01 Mar 2012, 11:22

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

hollowBallistix wrote:
rscsr wrote:
hollowBallistix wrote:In fact they used the Cosworth Engine in the RB1 in 2005

The RB2 switched to the Ferrari power unit, then the RB3, which was the 1st Newey Red Bull used Renault power unit, having passed the Ferrari contract onto the Toro Rosso team.

What is their contract situation now with Renault ? if for example they find that the packaging & cooling for the Mercedes or Ferrari power unit better suits Newey's design philosophy...how soon could they switch ?
I guess this wouldn't be feasible. Red Bull is now the works team for Renault and their main Sponsor is Infinity, which is owned by Nissan, where Renault holds 43% according to Wikipedia.
Hmmm, well they off loaded the Ferrari contract onto the Toro Rosso team so they could use a better engine that suited Newey's design style, I'm just surprised at the issues they had with the Renault lump, surely they would have known that they would wrap the bodywork as tight as possible, so this would have been one of the key design factors for Renault when developing the engine.

Now if Renault haven't managed that, and indeed it's going to compromise the designs that have lead Red Bull to be successful, then I can't see why they wouldn't switch to a different engine supplier.

Anyway, lets see how they do in the next tests scheduled, and I guess we won't really know where anyone stands until the first qualifying session for outright pace & reliability then in the race.
Couple of years back Red Bull was keen to obtain Mercedes Engines, for which Ross Brawn had urged the Mercedes to reject and they did so. If you have been reading articles from Gary Anderson and others on Autosport, the ultra tight packaging that Red Bull has done, even Renault engine guys have raised eyebrows. It leads us to believe that the packaging part has not been designed in conjunction with the engine manufacturer, which is causing problems at Red Bull. Renault themselves have problems related to engines, which means there is double headache at Red Bull - Renault.

User avatar
dren
226
Joined: 03 Mar 2010, 14:14

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

Red Bull most likely pushed the packaging. There probably were some communication issues as well. I just get the feeling Renault was rushed with the new power unit. Red Bull was the only Renault team cutting holes in their chassis for cooling. The other teams seemed fine with cooling requirements.
Honda!

f1316
f1316
82
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 18:36

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

dren wrote:Red Bull most likely pushed the packaging. There probably were some communication issues as well. I just get the feeling Renault was rushed with the new power unit. Red Bull was the only Renault team cutting holes in their chassis for cooling. The other teams seemed fine with cooling requirements.
I wouldn't say they were fine, Toro Rosso also had quite a few issues.

However, you're right that Caterham was able to put in a respectable amount of laps on the last day - and what was the first thing we all noticed about the Caterham (already the second thing... ;)? That it has much bigger concessions for cooling than all the other cars on this year's grid.

aral
aral
26
Joined: 03 Apr 2010, 22:49

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

dren wrote:Red Bull most likely pushed the packaging. There probably were some communication issues as well. I just get the feeling Renault was rushed with the new power unit. Red Bull was the only Renault team cutting holes in their chassis for cooling. The other teams seemed fine with cooling requirements.
Ferrari also had to cut extra vents in roughly the same position.

taperoo2k
taperoo2k
14
Joined: 02 Mar 2012, 17:33

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

hollowBallistix wrote:Considering ALL the Renault engine cars had issues, the route cause is probably down to Renault & not Red Bull, didn't one constructor have issues installing the engine because it didn't fit ?
Renault appears to made a mistake somewhere along the development of the new V6. It's anyone's guess as to how long it will take Renault to fix the problems.
Lotus knew there were problems with the power plant, now it's a race to see if Renault can fix their issues or if Red Bull need to compromise their design for the engine..
That had more to do with money saving more than likely, than knowing the Renault engine would have major problems.
Shakeman wrote:I think we can say two things, Renault has problems and that they are exacerbated by the RB team's installation.
Newey likes to package the engine and other hardware as tightly as possible. The KERS and Alternator issues Red Bull had probably had an element of things being packed together too tightly to allow proper airflow around them to keep them withing their normal operating temperature ranges.
There's a lot of people saying it'll be an easy fix and just a bit of moving around is required, I don't subscribe to this. But RB are not in the habit of leaving free space under their engine covers, no team does. So if things have to move, everything has to move like a sliding block puzzle. I know pipes can be extended or shortened or rerouted but still it must be a monumental undertaking to get it right and not compromise the CoG and aero philosophy of the car.
If there is not a simple fix, then it's probably going to mean redesigning the guts of the car to reposition components and to make sure they stay within their normal temperature tolerances. If that's the case most of the aero will likely need to be rethought.
Crabbia wrote:My two cents...

I dont think this was a design error by the redbull team and i dont think the Renault engine is or will be terrible. it may run a little hotter than the MB or ferrari, but that alone is not what i think happened to RB.
Newey appears to have packaged the new power train too tightly and Renault have mucked up the development, meaning the computer models and dyno results of the powertrain were inaccurate leading to Red Bull having critical problems with keeping the ERS and electronic control systems functional.
i think what happened is there was a mis-communication from Renault to the teams about the heat requirements needed for the ES. We aren't talking about simple one dimensional numbers here. Renault wont say to the team, you need to dissipate X amount of joules in heat per second. This information would be complex mathematical models of how and when and where on the ES the heat builds up. Possibly Renault didn't report correctly ( or its report wasn't understood correctly) on concentrated "hot spots" on the surface of the ES or other components.
Red Bull and Renault by all accounts were happy with the designs on both sides. It's only when they hit the track that they discovered they'd got it wrong. What you have to keep in mind is that Red Bull worked very closely with Renault on the new power trains as Red Bull is pretty much Renault's works team given the nature of the deal between the two. It's a monumental screw up. Newey will figure the cooling issues out on the RB10 eventually (took him most of 1994 to get the Williams into a driveable state after the FIA banned the active suspension system). Renault appears to have had a problem with the data it's gathered from the dyno and the track. While Newey probably pushed the new power train beyond what it's capable of handling. And remember the other Renault teams did manage to do more running than Red Bull. Pretty embarrassing for Red Bull if they have to go along Caterham's side pod style design to aid with airflow within the car to keep things cool.

onewingedangel wrote:Not to mention Mercedes and Ferrari and to a lesser extent Honda are not going to want their works teams shown up by a Red Bull.
All the manufacturers (bar Renault) will want to beat Red Bull. Honda will be no different to Mercedes and Ferrari on that score.
If the Renault engine proves a dud and their relationship breaks down I bet Red Bull will be making enquiries with Nissan, and if unsucessful then VW, BMW, Ford, Jaguar etc. about co-financing a new engine.
Cosworth has a V6 power train ready to go. However I doubt Red Bull and Renault will split, they'll struggle through together into sorting the issues out with the aim to get back on the winning bandwagon they've been on for the last few seasons. That's assuming the RB10 is one of Newey's less than stellar cars i.e. Fast but Fragile or a complete dogs dinner. Anyway with the warmer temperatures at the next test, the other power trains might struggle. Who knows.

User avatar
Juzh
161
Joined: 06 Oct 2012, 08:45

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

prince wrote: Couple of years back Red Bull was keen to obtain Mercedes Engines, for which Ross Brawn had urged the Mercedes to reject and they did so.
Not only Brawn, mclaren too:
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/01/15/n ... edes-deal/

guess they were very afraid of RB suddenly being on-par power wise at that time.

michl420
michl420
19
Joined: 18 Apr 2010, 17:08
Location: Austria

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

Everyone thinks it's a simply overheating problem, but that was never communicated. The visible problems are just small burn marks at the same point of both sidepods. And in this area is no cooler and normally no exhaust. So i would assume it is something electronic.

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

michl420 wrote:Everyone thinks it's a simply overheating problem, but that was never communicated.
This absolutely was communicated several times.

prince
prince
6
Joined: 01 Mar 2012, 11:22

Re: Red Bull RB10 Renault

Post

beelsebob wrote:
michl420 wrote:Everyone thinks it's a simply overheating problem, but that was never communicated.
This absolutely was communicated several times.
Was that not Christian Horner who said on the first day that, it was a silly issue of "spring fit wrongly"? After that we heard over heating, packaging and who knows what else. Red Bull has the strength to get it all fixed, but the question is, by when?