I don't see how it would be more constant without manipulation of the materials. Directing the heat isn't the same as dispersing the heat at a constant rate. Having it a constant rate is the most important aspect of this to work (that and making sure the brakes don't actually fail). I think it's possible to engineer a brake disk in such a way the heat builds up extensively under braking and after the braking phase it disperses the build up heat at a constant rate. So you are looking in the first place at that brake disks, and then if that succeeds you should find legal ways to get that heat between the edge of the diffuser and the wheel. I'd imagine the brake ducts have to be pretty forward in order to reach maximum effect.atanatizante wrote:
Another theory says that the brake drum & system vanes acts like a heater which by induction generates heat in all directions hence for the airflow which travels under the brake system vanes.
This way the airflow is energized ...
1. Could this so called "heater" be a more constant heat generator?
2. And another question is why they didn`t follow the other teams route with the rounded outer diffuser edge?
Definitely a single exhaust:atanatizante wrote:http://imgur.com/yoqa8W4.jpg
Two things:
1. B.E.A.U.T.I.F.U.L side-pod ellipse shape
2. It`s the picture angle or they just tried a single exhaust side-pod configuration?
http://imgur.com/6Gsqu3c.jpg
1. This year they have a longer T-tray floor or it`s just me? (not in this picture)
2. For the above reason they reinforced the front corners of the T-tray floor
3. Could be another reason why they have such a high rake? or they must have a short one?
If that's from today, there are plenty of photos to show that it's not the case. There would be no reason for an asymmetrical hot air outlet setup on these cars. It's just the perspective of the photo.
Visualise and Mercedes-Benz have developed a 360 video experience like nothing seen before. The Mercedes-Benz Formula One experience not only marks the first on-board footage ever captured of a turbocharged V6 Formula One car – but it debuts innovative 360 degree filming technology to allow fans to watch action from every angle.
For an even more immersive experience fans can download the ‘F1 360′ App which makes use of the gyroscopic functions inside the iPad giving the viewer a full 360 video. The experience was shot on location in Silverstone with the Mercedes team on the brand new turbocharged V6 Mercedes AMG Petronas F1 W05 driven by Nico Rosberg. --Source: Visualise
I'm not sure, did they test the exhaust cannon in Jerez? It could be perspective, but the other side should show the bulge for the opening and it is not there.otbsti wrote:If that's from today, there are plenty of photos to show that it's not the case. There would be no reason for an asymmetrical hot air outlet setup on these cars. It's just the perspective of the photo.
Looks like a max cooling spec; even the grills near the cockpit are biggerBlackout wrote:the much wider central cooling outlet
http://www.servimg.com/image_preview.ph ... u=14795526
Yep, it was local, it was good fun, and at least I didn't pay F1-ticket money to watch a Mercedes make the same noise.bonjon1979 wrote:You need to make some better choices about what to do with your time. Seriously, a lawnmower race?PhillipM wrote:I once went to watch a local single-cylinder lawnmower race - that sounds just the same...Shakeman wrote:Vroom vroom....
Looks like Merc are turning the wick up. Impressive number of laps completed during tests and now they're putting some quick times in. I think we can say Merc are in a good place this year.dans79 wrote:I'm talking about comparing to a known quantity, like last years qualifying times. Assuming a team isn't cheating, If someone goes out tomorrow and puts in a low 1:34 of high 1:33 people would sit up and take notice. A fast lap time is a line in the sand, or a statement of intent to your competion.krisfx wrote: Times are almost completely irrelevant, they could be running heavy or down on power in comparison to the other teams for testing...
I would normally be the first person to say testing times are irrelevant, but regardless of fuel loads, a 1:33.283 by rosberg on the soft tyres is going to be hard to ignore. By comparison that means the W05 is within a tenth of a second from pole position from last year which was 1:32.330, considering the initial impression was that the 2014 cars would be 5 seconds slower than last years.Shakeman wrote:Looks like Merc are turning the wick up. Impressive number of laps completed during tests and now they're putting some quick times in. I think we can say Merc are in a good place this year.dans79 wrote:I'm talking about comparing to a known quantity, like last years qualifying times. Assuming a team isn't cheating, If someone goes out tomorrow and puts in a low 1:34 of high 1:33 people would sit up and take notice. A fast lap time is a line in the sand, or a statement of intent to your competion.krisfx wrote: Times are almost completely irrelevant, they could be running heavy or down on power in comparison to the other teams for testing...
I've also not seen any ragged tyres yet so hopefully not going to be an issue this year.