redesign time should not be a problem, they have what 500 staff? Im sure they could force 7 day working, if not double shifts. You are easily looking at 500 people, 7 days a week for 10 hrs a day, thats 35,000 man hours.bonjon1979 wrote:Its ludicrous to think that they could just knock up a new rear end in the short time since the first test. They probably have to move components around altering the whole architecture of the rear. They have to design, test and then build a new solution. This takes a long time, it's not going to happen in the space of three - four weeks. Instead, they're trying to make do with what they've got while putting in the hours to develop a solution. That's how I read it, rather than stubbornness on Newey's part.
Yet Mercedes are trying out various different cooling packages, and this on a car that essentially works. It's ludicrous to think that a solution couldn't be found if they said to hell with optimal aero, let's just get some miles on this thing.bonjon1979 wrote:Its ludicrous to think that they could just knock up a new rear end in the short time since the first test. They probably have to move components around altering the whole architecture of the rear. They have to design, test and then build a new solution. This takes a long time, it's not going to happen in the space of three - four weeks. Instead, they're trying to make do with what they've got while putting in the hours to develop a solution. That's how I read it, rather than stubbornness on Newey's part.
I have to agree.bonjon1979 wrote:Its ludicrous to think that they could just knock up a new rear end in the short time since the first test. They probably have to move components around altering the whole architecture of the rear. They have to design, test and then build a new solution. This takes a long time, it's not going to happen in the space of three - four weeks. Instead, they're trying to make do with what they've got while putting in the hours to develop a solution. That's how I read it, rather than stubbornness on Newey's part.
It's probably because the issues are so fundamental that easy changes to the bodywork won't make the slightest difference otherwise they would've done it already.f1rules wrote:im sorry but rb do seem a bit arrogant not wanting to cut open, or make a new side pod layout which is not so slim at the rear, they could even go the mercedes route, which they used themselfes for years, and have a big outlet and the end of the engine cover, but noooo, no changes in bodywork!
Hm dunno, there are plenty of examples from the past where teams went from hero to zero.danielk wrote:I just cannot write red bull off this year. They had a car last year which was so much more superior last year. Yes allot has been changed but they had an understanding of things much more than any other team. That understanding doesnt just go puff. Once they get on top of the Overheating they indeed will be close to the front of the grid, the only limiting factor is renault, how good is the engine once it can run. Engine freeze is tomorrow..............
It looks like they're paying the price for last year's dominance which was flattered by other teams focussing on this year early.danielk wrote:I just cannot write red bull off this year. They had a car last year which was so much more superior last year. Yes allot has been changed but they had an understanding of things much more than any other team. That understanding doesnt just go puff. Once they get on top of the Overheating they indeed will be close to the front of the grid, the only limiting factor is renault, how good is the engine once it can run. Engine freeze is tomorrow..............
Yes, it is. But like I said, the way it opens at the sides makes it look higher than it is. That doesn't mean it still isn't high at the rear.Owen.C93 wrote:Foot plate is standard I believe.