Mercedes AMG F1 W05

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Caerdroia
Caerdroia
6
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 22:15

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

A ferrari video but relevant to the discussion about Merc's fuel. They ran a test using their usual race fuel and then normal road fuel. Rough estimations were road fuel was 1 second a lap slower, with problems with the pickup. Alonso says he felt the power was the same, and that the pickup problems could at least partly be solved with the engine maps.


atlantis
atlantis
21
Joined: 24 Jan 2014, 14:33

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

Caerdroia wrote:A ferrari video but relevant to the discussion about Merc's fuel. They ran a test using their usual race fuel and then normal road fuel. Rough estimations were road fuel was 1 second a lap slower, with problems with the pickup. Alonso says he felt the power was the same, and that the pickup problems could at least partly be solved with the engine maps.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5jei8Y19vI
Isn't it an old video?

User avatar
Shakeman
33
Joined: 21 Mar 2011, 13:31
Location: UK

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

n smikle wrote:An F1 car can be run on gas from your local neighbourhood pump, so I'm not expecting too much "magic" between fuels.
Not sure why this got a down vote because...



Edit, bugger someone beat me to it. That'll teach me for not refreshing.

User avatar
Shakeman
33
Joined: 21 Mar 2011, 13:31
Location: UK

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

atlantis wrote:
Caerdroia wrote:A ferrari video but relevant to the discussion about Merc's fuel. They ran a test using their usual race fuel and then normal road fuel. Rough estimations were road fuel was 1 second a lap slower, with problems with the pickup. Alonso says he felt the power was the same, and that the pickup problems could at least partly be solved with the engine maps.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5jei8Y19vI
Isn't it an old video?
Does it matter that it is an old video?

There maybe a difference between road fuel and racing fuel but there is unlikely to be that difference between racing fuels from different manufacturers. If there is then Petronas has a big lead.

User avatar
De Jokke
0
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 02:51

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

I read some comments about that the W05 hasn't got a weak spot but I'm afraid we've already seen it: wet track.
As the car is more than a sec. clear in dry weather, it's all been whiped out in wet weather. How come? Any one any ideas? Can they fix that?
Mercedes AMG + Hamilton => dreamteam!
If you can't beat'em, call Masi!

atlantis
atlantis
21
Joined: 24 Jan 2014, 14:33

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

Shakeman wrote:
atlantis wrote:
Caerdroia wrote:A ferrari video but relevant to the discussion about Merc's fuel. They ran a test using their usual race fuel and then normal road fuel. Rough estimations were road fuel was 1 second a lap slower, with problems with the pickup. Alonso says he felt the power was the same, and that the pickup problems could at least partly be solved with the engine maps.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5jei8Y19vI
Isn't it an old video?
Does it matter that it is an old video?

There maybe a difference between road fuel and racing fuel but there is unlikely to be that difference between racing fuels from different manufacturers. If there is then Petronas has a big lead.
Absolutely no. I just thought it was relevant to the new engines regulations :)
Last edited by atlantis on 09 Apr 2014, 15:42, edited 1 time in total.

astracrazy
astracrazy
31
Joined: 04 Mar 2009, 16:04

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

De Jokke wrote:I read some comments about that the W05 hasn't got a weak spot but I'm afraid we've already seen it: wet track.
As the car is more than a sec. clear in dry weather, it's all been whiped out in wet weather. How come? Any one any ideas? Can they fix that?
I don't think your right there. Your looking at the wet quali's i guess? But in dry quali it wasn't too different, they werent more than a sec clear - only in the race.

Mercs strength is race pace so i would expect them to pull away in a wet race too.

We will just have to wait and see

User avatar
De Jokke
0
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 02:51

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

astracrazy wrote:
De Jokke wrote:I read some comments about that the W05 hasn't got a weak spot but I'm afraid we've already seen it: wet track.
As the car is more than a sec. clear in dry weather, it's all been whiped out in wet weather. How come? Any one any ideas? Can they fix that?
I don't think your right there. Your looking at the wet quali's i guess? But in dry quali it wasn't too different, they werent more than a sec clear - only in the race.

Mercs strength is race pace so i would expect them to pull away in a wet race too.

We will just have to wait and see
Indeed, the Quali's. I hope you're right but I'm not too sure. In dry we're fast and in the race too. In wet we're slow (compared to dry pace) and I assume this will continue in the race too. Seems like the car is so gentle on the tyres in dry weather, maybe it can't heat them enough in wet weather? Hence the performance drop of almost a sec. ?
Mercedes AMG + Hamilton => dreamteam!
If you can't beat'em, call Masi!

User avatar
Shakeman
33
Joined: 21 Mar 2011, 13:31
Location: UK

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

Emerson.F wrote:Sky Sports F1 2014: How Mercedes become so strong in 2014
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuBB2F6IutQ
Interesting but is that the whole reason Merc are 1 second up the road?

With all that extra power they've also managed to transmit that through the tyres into the road without turning the tyres into smoking hoops. The issues Merc had last year with tyres is now gone (notwithstanding the tyres are more durable) and they appear to be better or at least as good as other teams on tyre life and performance. Can anyone see what they've done?

The car also appears to be pretty good in the fast corners too so their aero is also not letting them down either and it appears to be an 8 or 9 in most areas and it's the sum of its parts that is making the big difference.

I was watching the highlights of BAH again and noticed at the safety car restart from an onboard of one of the FIs that the two Merc just disappeared in seconds. It was a phenomenal view of their dominance.

User avatar
Godius
186
Joined: 02 Mar 2013, 12:49
Location: NL

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

Shakeman wrote:
Emerson.F wrote:Sky Sports F1 2014: How Mercedes become so strong in 2014
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuBB2F6IutQ
I was watching the highlights of BAH again and noticed at the safety car restart from an onboard of one of the FIs that the two Merc just disappeared in seconds. It was a phenomenal view of their dominance.
The FI's were already on 7 laps old tires. Merc extended their first stint and second stint a bit and changed tires around the start of the SC period. That plays a small role as well.

Emerson.F
Emerson.F
20
Joined: 20 Dec 2012, 22:25
Location: Amsterdam

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

Shakeman wrote:
Emerson.F wrote:Sky Sports F1 2014: How Mercedes become so strong in 2014
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuBB2F6IutQ
Interesting but is that the whole reason Merc are 1 second up the road?

With all that extra power they've also managed to transmit that through the tyres into the road without turning the tyres into smoking hoops. The issues Merc had last year with tyres is now gone (notwithstanding the tyres are more durable) and they appear to be better or at least as good as other teams on tyre life and performance. Can anyone see what they've done?

The car also appears to be pretty good in the fast corners too so their aero is also not letting them down either and it appears to be an 8 or 9 in most areas and it's the sum of its parts that is making the big difference.

I was watching the highlights of BAH again and noticed at the safety car restart from an onboard of one of the FIs that the two Merc just disappeared in seconds. It was a phenomenal view of their dominance.

The W04 was very front limited ever since the W02. They changed the weight balance and rear suspension was also changed. The W05 is far less front end limited and is much better balanced.
Supporting: Ham/Alo/Kimi/Ros/Seb/Hulk/Ric/Mag

deschrijver
deschrijver
1
Joined: 01 May 2012, 22:09

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

I saw the word tires here and I directly tought about the 1000km tire test the merc's had in 2013.
Mayby 1 of the advantages, they have this year for tuning there chassis and set-up of the 2014 car.

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

De Jokke wrote:I read some comments about that the W05 hasn't got a weak spot but I'm afraid we've already seen it: wet track.
As the car is more than a sec. clear in dry weather, it's all been whiped out in wet weather. How come? Any one any ideas? Can they fix that?
More specifically, it's weak spot is turn in. It appears to have a fairly weak front end, especially in low speed corners.

prince
prince
6
Joined: 01 Mar 2012, 11:22

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

beelsebob wrote:
De Jokke wrote:I read some comments about that the W05 hasn't got a weak spot but I'm afraid we've already seen it: wet track.
As the car is more than a sec. clear in dry weather, it's all been whiped out in wet weather. How come? Any one any ideas? Can they fix that?
More specifically, it's weak spot is turn in. It appears to have a fairly weak front end, especially in low speed corners.
Wasn't that their strength last year, slow corners? You reckon they have lost it with W05?

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W05

Post

prince wrote:
beelsebob wrote:
De Jokke wrote:I read some comments about that the W05 hasn't got a weak spot but I'm afraid we've already seen it: wet track.
As the car is more than a sec. clear in dry weather, it's all been whiped out in wet weather. How come? Any one any ideas? Can they fix that?
More specifically, it's weak spot is turn in. It appears to have a fairly weak front end, especially in low speed corners.
Wasn't that their strength last year, slow corners? You reckon they have lost it with W05?
Their strength last year was exiting slow corners. They still appear to be fairly good at that, but their entry to them is terrible. The car just does not want to turn in.