2014 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
User avatar
SiLo
138
Joined: 25 Jul 2010, 19:09

Re: 2014 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai

Post

iotar__ wrote:Rosberg: "Then on my final timed lap, I was half a second quicker going into the last corner - but my time delta on my steering wheel display said that I was two tenths slower. So I just took a big risk and spun because I mistakenly thought I had nothing to lose anyway."
What a hell? Next there will be a correction that it was Rosberg himself choosing wrong display, just like strategy in Bahrain #-o .
Half a second quicker than what? His previous best lap? That would still have put him 7 tenths away from Hamilton and only one more place up the grid...

My prediction for tomorrow is the race is dry [-o< fingers crossed [-o<

1. Hamilton
2. Rosberg
3. Vettel
4. Ric
5. Alonso

Don't think it will chance much apart from Rosberg jumping the Red Bulls. Hamilton likely to win by a fair margin if he is happy with his setup.
Felipe Baby!

JimClarkFan
JimClarkFan
27
Joined: 18 Mar 2012, 23:31

Re: 2014 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai

Post

Andrea Stella who has worked with Alonso and kimi has said Alonso is better. He said of kimi that he is very fast but only when the car is to his liking. Case closed. It is tiring seeing the fanboys talk about kimi aging and making a plethora of other excuses.

As a more of a neutral f1 fan, I have never thought kimi was as good as his hoard of fans had thought.

User avatar
FoxHound
55
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 16:50

Re: 2014 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai

Post

JimClarkFan wrote:Andrea Stella who has worked with Alonso and kimi has said Alonso is better. He said of kimi that he is very fast but only when the car is to his liking. Case closed. It is tiring seeing the fanboys talk about kimi aging and making a plethora of other excuses.

As a more of a neutral f1 fan, I have never thought kimi was as good as his hoard of fans had thought.
Because this^^^ will not antagonise Kimi fans..... 8-[
JET set

Emerson.F
Emerson.F
20
Joined: 20 Dec 2012, 22:25
Location: Amsterdam

Re: 2014 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai

Post

iotar__ wrote:Rosberg: "Then on my final timed lap, I was half a second quicker going into the last corner - but my time delta on my steering wheel display said that I was two tenths slower. So I just took a big risk and spun because I mistakenly thought I had nothing to lose anyway."
What a hell? Next there will be a correction that it was Rosberg himself choosing wrong display, just like strategy in Bahrain #-o .
Source?
Supporting: Ham/Alo/Kimi/Ros/Seb/Hulk/Ric/Mag

johnny99
johnny99
1
Joined: 09 Apr 2009, 19:28
Location: Killucan Westmeath Ireland

Re: 2014 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai

Post

Correct JimClarkFan, and if Massa was in the car today, fans would be asking for his head. Alonso is on another level.

John

LionKing
LionKing
4
Joined: 26 Jun 2010, 22:03

Re: 2014 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai

Post

Emerson.F wrote:
iotar__ wrote:Rosberg: "Then on my final timed lap, I was half a second quicker going into the last corner - but my time delta on my steering wheel display said that I was two tenths slower. So I just took a big risk and spun because I mistakenly thought I had nothing to lose anyway."
What a hell? Next there will be a correction that it was Rosberg himself choosing wrong display, just like strategy in Bahrain #-o .
Source?
I couldn't watch this quali. If what Rosberg saying is true, the timing would indicate he should be quite up at the end of S2. I am sure people would have noticed. Also the S1 and S2 times from quali indicate otherwise...

User avatar
Phil
66
Joined: 25 Sep 2012, 16:22

Re: 2014 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai

Post

AFAIK he was up - but Hamilton was on a quicker lap when he aborted. They both wpuld have gone quicker i think. Hamilton though never completed that lap.
Not for nothing, Rosberg's Championship is the only thing that lends credibility to Hamilton's recent success. Otherwise, he'd just be the guy who's had the best car. — bhall II
#Team44 supporter

LionKing
LionKing
4
Joined: 26 Jun 2010, 22:03

Re: 2014 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai

Post

FoxHound wrote:
JimClarkFan wrote:Andrea Stella who has worked with Alonso and kimi has said Alonso is better. He said of kimi that he is very fast but only when the car is to his liking. Case closed. It is tiring seeing the fanboys talk about kimi aging and making a plethora of other excuses.

As a more of a neutral f1 fan, I have never thought kimi was as good as his hoard of fans had thought.
Because this^^^ will not antagonise Kimi fans..... 8-[
Kimi was edged by Massa in quali in their 2.5 year Ferrari stint. Massa had also quite a bit more poles than Kimi in that period. Kimi is very good racer but not that much of a good qualifier.

Also Alonso was paired twice with good qualifiers and he lost both matchups. Truli (16-15), Hamilton (10-7).

User avatar
Powershift
-2
Joined: 16 Mar 2012, 04:32

Re: 2014 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai

Post

ROS, MAS, BOT, HUL, RAI, BUT, MAG & PER all qualified below their dry condition positions so it should be a good race behind HAM, similar to Bahrain with the battles throughout the field, except not for the lead in China. Assuming a dry race of course
Winning is the most important. Everything is consequence of that. Being second is to be the first of the ones who lose.-Ayrton Senna

User avatar
Juzh
161
Joined: 06 Oct 2012, 08:45

Re: 2014 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai

Post

LionKing wrote: I couldn't watch this quali. If what Rosberg saying is true, the timing would indicate he should be quite up at the end of S2. I am sure people would have noticed. Also the S1 and S2 times from quali indicate otherwise...
Rosberg's final lap S1 was 1/10 slower than his best, S2 was 2/10 slower than his best. He was maybe up on himself into the last corner but still at least 5/10 off hamilton.

GrandAxe
GrandAxe
12
Joined: 01 Aug 2013, 17:06

Re: 2014 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai

Post

JimClarkFan wrote:Andrea Stella who has worked with Alonso and kimi has said Alonso is better. He said of kimi that he is very fast but only when the car is to his liking. Case closed. It is tiring seeing the fanboys talk about kimi aging and making a plethora of other excuses.

As a more of a neutral f1 fan, I have never thought kimi was as good as his hoard of fans had thought.
Is there something against courtesy and decorum on this site?

User avatar
Phil
66
Joined: 25 Sep 2012, 16:22

Re: 2014 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai

Post

Just to reclarify and watching QF again...

2nd attemp: Rosberg was quick, but locked up in the end which ment he didnt improve. Then Hamilton who was a bit quicker improved his time by another 4+ tenths. Both had another attempt to the checkered flag though, so i think that's where Rosberg claimed to be quicker, though he needed to be over 1.283seconds quicker than his previous quickest to beat Lewis with compromised tyres.... I'm not that sure. I think Hamilton also aborted once Rosberg lost his car at the finish line, so who knows if he had imprved as well.... If what Rosberg sais is true, he would have been 1.8seconds quicker than his previous best? Not sure about that one.
Not for nothing, Rosberg's Championship is the only thing that lends credibility to Hamilton's recent success. Otherwise, he'd just be the guy who's had the best car. — bhall II
#Team44 supporter

lebesset
lebesset
7
Joined: 06 Aug 2008, 14:00

Re: 2014 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai

Post

Juzh wrote:
LionKing wrote: I couldn't watch this quali. If what Rosberg saying is true, the timing would indicate he should be quite up at the end of S2. I am sure people would have noticed. Also the S1 and S2 times from quali indicate otherwise...
Rosberg's final lap S1 was 1/10 slower than his best, S2 was 2/10 slower than his best. He was maybe up on himself into the last corner but still at least 5/10 off hamilton.
rosberg up on hamilton at any point ?
if you look at the timing hamilton was not only fastest , he was fastest in every sector !
to the optimist a glass is half full ; to the pessimist a glass is half empty ; to the F1 engineer the glass is twice as big as it needs to be

User avatar
Juzh
161
Joined: 06 Oct 2012, 08:45

Re: 2014 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai

Post

lebesset wrote:
Juzh wrote:
LionKing wrote: I couldn't watch this quali. If what Rosberg saying is true, the timing would indicate he should be quite up at the end of S2. I am sure people would have noticed. Also the S1 and S2 times from quali indicate otherwise...
Rosberg's final lap S1 was 1/10 slower than his best, S2 was 2/10 slower than his best. He was maybe up on himself into the last corner but still at least 5/10 off hamilton.
rosberg up on hamilton at any point ?
if you look at the timing hamilton was not only fastest , he was fastest in every sector !
He wasn't up, read again.

sennafan24
sennafan24
0
Joined: 09 Jul 2013, 17:36

Re: 2014 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai

Post

Emerson.F wrote: Source?
Tobias Grüner F1 ‏@tgruener 39m
#F1 Due to display problem Rosberg thought to be 0.2s behind personal best in last corner. Actually he was 0.6 quicker. Spin prevented P2.