Vettel vs Ricciardo 2014

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
User avatar
Cam
45
Joined: 02 Mar 2012, 08:38

Re: Vettel vs Ricciardo 2014

Post

iotar__ wrote: Pity we won't have a chance to learn how much made up chassis problems cost him in tenths of a second not morale.
wtf? Red Bull "made up" a chassis problem. An incorrect theory I can handle, accusing someone based on zero evidence is another issue. Unless you can provide that, it's time to let it go.
“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.”
― Socrates
Ignorance is a state of being uninformed. Ignorant describes a person in the state of being unaware
who deliberately ignores or disregards important information or facts. © all rights reserved.

User avatar
iotar__
7
Joined: 28 Sep 2012, 12:31

Re: Vettel vs Ricciardo 2014

Post

Cam wrote:
iotar__ wrote: Pity we won't have a chance to learn how much made up chassis problems cost him in tenths of a second not morale.
wtf? Red Bull "made up" a chassis problem. An incorrect theory I can handle, accusing someone based on zero evidence is another issue. Unless you can provide that, it's time to let it go.
On the contrary:
1. They announced possible chassis problems (Marko) before checking purely based on Vettel's form.
2. There were no chassis problems found - if they were why don't you provide any evidence for it? Team announcement would be a good start.

Now why don't you go and downvote 2+2=4 or some other inconvenient reality

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: Vettel vs Ricciardo 2014

Post

Ah no... . Not another conspiracy theory.

Marko suspected a chassis problem, specifically stating that he believed that even though he also said that at the time evidence had yet to be found.

Turns out Marko was just plain wrong. Not like it's the first time. There's nothing made up; they changed the chassis because they weren't sure. Then they made a press release saying they didn't find anything. It's as simple as crossing one item from the possible problem list.
#AeroFrodo

User avatar
Cam
45
Joined: 02 Mar 2012, 08:38

Re: Vettel vs Ricciardo 2014

Post

Yep. Spot on. They also said it was scheduled, so regardless, it was getting swapped. There is no skulduggery here.
Red Bull has confirmed that the German will get a different chassis for this weekend's Barcelona race, but in an interview on the team's website chief designer Rob Marshall said this was a routine move. "Sebastian will get a new chassis for Barcelona, which was scheduled at the start of the season and then the next one will be for Dan at some time around Silverstone," he said.
iotar__ wrote: On the contrary:
1. They announced possible chassis problems (Marko) before checking purely based on Vettel's form.
2. There were no chassis problems found - if they were why don't you provide any evidence for it? Team announcement would be a good start.

Now why don't you go and downvote 2+2=4 or some other inconvenient reality
:lol: sorry math is inconvenient for you. Those darned numbers.
“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.”
― Socrates
Ignorance is a state of being uninformed. Ignorant describes a person in the state of being unaware
who deliberately ignores or disregards important information or facts. © all rights reserved.

User avatar
Pierce89
60
Joined: 21 Oct 2009, 18:38

Re: Vettel vs Ricciardo 2014

Post

Cam wrote:
iotar__ wrote: Pity we won't have a chance to learn how much made up chassis problems cost him in tenths of a second not morale.
wtf? Red Bull "made up" a chassis problem. An incorrect theory I can handle, accusing someone based on zero evidence is another issue. Unless you can provide that, it's time to let it go.
What about this: Vettel clearly states they decided after China "in case". The whole chassis swap deal in f1 in general is just a mental thing for the driver.

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/113828
“To be able to actually make something is awfully nice”
Bruce McLaren on building his first McLaren racecars, 1970

“I've got to be careful what I say, but possibly to probably Juan would have had a bigger go”
Sir Frank Williams after the 2003 Canadian GP, where Ralf hesitated to pass brother M. Schumacher

User avatar
Cam
45
Joined: 02 Mar 2012, 08:38

Re: Vettel vs Ricciardo 2014

Post

What are you all trying to prove? Vettel is a liar? Red bull is lying? It was Horner on the grassy knoll? Newey faked the moon landing? What? You have a 4x F1 WDC complaining about a chassis and he's under-performing. The team swapped it, as per a scheduled event, for an old one. The team then stated they could not yet find any issues with the original chassis. So does that mean there was no issue, or just they haven't identified it yet?

You're making too much out of off handed comments by people who probably don't know the full story. For all we know, Vettel didn't even know a scheduled chassis change was planned. I'm sure lots is discussed with him, but not everything. Unless you're in the team you'll never know.

So what if they changed it to ease his mind. They're here to win. Doing nothing is not an option. I bet Alonso would love a chassis change about now. Your efforts are probably better directed at that train wreck, rather than this 'conspiracy'.
“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.”
― Socrates
Ignorance is a state of being uninformed. Ignorant describes a person in the state of being unaware
who deliberately ignores or disregards important information or facts. © all rights reserved.

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Vettel vs Ricciardo 2014

Post

Cam wrote:What are you all trying to prove? Vettel is a liar? Red bull is lying? It was Horner on the grassy knoll? Newey faked the moon landing? What? You have a 4x F1 WDC complaining about a chassis and he's under-performing. The team swapped it, as per a scheduled event, for an old one.
No you don't. Vettel did not in fact complain about the chassis at any point, and was pessimistic about the likelihood of changing it fixing anything.
The team then stated they could not yet find any issues with the original chassis. So does that mean there was no issue, or just they haven't identified it yet?
Given that they didn't expect to find anything, and they indeed didn't, I'd say there's a high likelihood that there was no issue. It is of course not a guarantee.

User avatar
Cam
45
Joined: 02 Mar 2012, 08:38

Re: Vettel vs Ricciardo 2014

Post

Vettel wrote:"I think we concluded after China - where we were quite a bit behind - to change the chassis," he added.

"It is not a new chassis, it is an old one that we used for testing during the winter and we have some experience with it so it is more just to check rather than a problem with the other chassis.

"So we will try everything we can and just basically reset and start again. Obviously there is still a lot of work ahead of us, as I mentioned after the first couple of races maybe I am not as happy as I want to be, but it is a long process, a lot of things have changed and we need to be patient.

"It is not unusual to change chassis, normally when you change chassis you change to a new one, but we have decided to go to an old one just to make sure nothing is wrong. We are just changing the things that we can to have a reset and try again. We don't think there was anything wrong with the old chassis, but nevertheless we have decided to change."
looks like he did mention it, to the team. Just because his every word is not reported in the media, don't assume they are not discussing things internally. He even admitted it might be all in his head.
"It's more a sanity check rather than a real problem with the other chassis," Vettel said. "So it's just to try everything we can, and basically reset and start again."
So again, I ask, what are you all try to insinuate?
“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.”
― Socrates
Ignorance is a state of being uninformed. Ignorant describes a person in the state of being unaware
who deliberately ignores or disregards important information or facts. © all rights reserved.

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Vettel vs Ricciardo 2014

Post

You yourself just quoted Vettel as saying that he didn't think there was a problem with the Chassis... What more do we need to say?

User avatar
Cam
45
Joined: 02 Mar 2012, 08:38

Re: Vettel vs Ricciardo 2014

Post

This is where you always take it @beelsebob. Go back to the original quote - here it is for your again:
Cam wrote:
iotar__ wrote: Pity we won't have a chance to learn how much made up chassis problems cost him in tenths of a second not morale.
wtf? Red Bull "made up" a chassis problem. An incorrect theory I can handle, accusing someone based on zero evidence is another issue. Unless you can provide that, it's time to let it go.
@iotar___ essentially accused Red Bull of making a story about a faulty chassis. I called him on it.
No one is disputing:
• Vettel is under-performing
• it could be in his head
• the chassis was changed
• it was scheduled
• they used an old chassis
• he'll get a new chassis
• initially it was thought there was a bent chassis
• further test show no damage can be identified, at this stage

They are the facts - so where on earth do any facts say "made up chassis problems cost him in tenths of a second not morale"? I have asked several times and am yet to get any evidence. Only more mouthing off.

Now you want to skew the argument again to something no-one is talking about.... which is what you always do.

Either front up with some evidence that Red Bull deliberately tried to pass off a faulty chassis to hide his form - or leave it alone.
“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.”
― Socrates
Ignorance is a state of being uninformed. Ignorant describes a person in the state of being unaware
who deliberately ignores or disregards important information or facts. © all rights reserved.

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Vettel vs Ricciardo 2014

Post

I at least was not asserting that red bull deliberately made up a chassis problem to hide his form. Only that he had poor form, and that red bull then spend a lot of publicity time telling the world (or at very least strongly implying to the world) that the chassis was the problem, only to discover that it wasn't.

I couldn't care less whether RedBull are trying to cover for Vettel or not frankly.

User avatar
Cam
45
Joined: 02 Mar 2012, 08:38

Re: Vettel vs Ricciardo 2014

Post

beelsebob wrote:I at least was not asserting that red bull deliberately made up a chassis problem to hide his form. Only that he had poor form, and that red bull then spend a lot of publicity time telling the world (or at very least strongly implying to the world) that the chassis was the problem, only to discover that it wasn't.

I couldn't care less whether RedBull are trying to cover for Vettel or not frankly.
Then why are we having this conversation? I don't care either. I only care if someone makes an allegation with no evidence, that was my beef.
“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.”
― Socrates
Ignorance is a state of being uninformed. Ignorant describes a person in the state of being unaware
who deliberately ignores or disregards important information or facts. © all rights reserved.

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Vettel vs Ricciardo 2014

Post

Cam wrote:
beelsebob wrote:I at least was not asserting that red bull deliberately made up a chassis problem to hide his form. Only that he had poor form, and that red bull then spend a lot of publicity time telling the world (or at very least strongly implying to the world) that the chassis was the problem, only to discover that it wasn't.

I couldn't care less whether RedBull are trying to cover for Vettel or not frankly.
Then why are we having this conversation? I don't care either. I only care if someone makes an allegation with no evidence, that was my beef.
Then I think once again, we're violently agreeing. We need to stop doing this.

User avatar
Cam
45
Joined: 02 Mar 2012, 08:38

Re: Vettel vs Ricciardo 2014

Post

:lol: okay, back on topic.
Tost wrote:"If we have a skilled and fast driver, it is easier when you bring in a young super-talent".
He was, of course, referring to the Torro Rosso lineup and distinguishing talent this way, instead of bringing in two new drivers at the same time. In that content, he's right, and that statement rings true across teams and sporting disciplines.

Tost further goes on to give more insight in Ricciardo. Vettel looks like he certainly has a worthy competitor next to him.
Tost wrote:"I expected him to be very competitive and comfortable in a very short space of time, so it has not been a surprise to me. Ricciardo gives very clear and detailed technical feedback, and so maybe he has just adapted to the circumstances more quickly than Vettel"
Or basically, he's saying, Ricciardo is simply doing a better job at the moment. That's no small accomplishment.

Out of all the driver pairing battles, this one has the most explosive power. Sure Kimi v Alonso or Hamilton V Rosberg is good (but we all kinds figure which way they will all go), but a relative junior up against a 4 x WDC.... let's hope Vettels luck clears up and we can all finally put aside any 'conspiracys' :-k
“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.”
― Socrates
Ignorance is a state of being uninformed. Ignorant describes a person in the state of being unaware
who deliberately ignores or disregards important information or facts. © all rights reserved.

Vettel Maggot
Vettel Maggot
4
Joined: 28 Jan 2014, 08:30

Re: Vettel vs Ricciardo 2014

Post

Vettel slower again. Blames his car again.