Williams FW36 Mercedes

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Williams FW36 Mercedes

Post

JDC123 wrote:How on earth are Williams able to achieve the cooling requirements of these power units, when they have no visibly large hot air outlet compared to every other mercedes powered cars, including mercedes themselves who would have known the cooling requirements for this engine long before customer teams, yet still have substantially large hot air outlets hidden between the suspension arms. Does anyone know the radiator layout Williams use, as even in previous years they have never ran with a large cooling outlet when the likes of Red bull with the same Renault engine always had a huge opening at the rear of the engine cover.
What on earth do you mean? There's a huge cooling hole at the back all around the gearbox.

JDC123
JDC123
30
Joined: 20 Jun 2013, 21:02

Re: Williams FW36 Mercedes

Post

beelsebob wrote:
JDC123 wrote:How on earth are Williams able to achieve the cooling requirements of these power units, when they have no visibly large hot air outlet compared to every other mercedes powered cars, including mercedes themselves who would have known the cooling requirements for this engine long before customer teams, yet still have substantially large hot air outlets hidden between the suspension arms. Does anyone know the radiator layout Williams use, as even in previous years they have never ran with a large cooling outlet when the likes of Red bull with the same Renault engine always had a huge opening at the rear of the engine cover.
What on earth do you mean? There's a huge cooling hole at the back all around the gearbox.
This:
Image

Relative to this:
Image

And This
Image
I wouldn't class the Williams arrangement as a "huge cooling hole" when IN COMPARISON to McLaren and Mercedes! If you also look back the last year Williams never really had much of a cooling outlet IN COMPARISON to other teams with the same engine

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Williams FW36 Mercedes

Post

No, just as last year, the Williams simply has a different shape of cooling outlet. The area around the large hole in the back of the body work is easily as large as the directed outputs Mercedes and McLaren have.

Sevach
Sevach
1081
Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 17:00

Re: Williams FW36 Mercedes

Post

beelsebob wrote:No, just as last year, the Williams simply has a different shape of cooling outlet. The area around the large hole in the back of the body work is easily as large as the directed outputs Mercedes and McLaren have.
Yes, instead of having a funnel or sidepod extensions to let the air out, Williams simply cuts off the body and let's the air escape there.

As a result there's less of a bulge, but a pretty big exit still.

rjsa
rjsa
51
Joined: 02 Mar 2007, 03:01

Re: Williams FW36 Mercedes

Post

Cooling outlet that was copied in the latest Ferrari update.

triptube
triptube
11
Joined: 27 May 2014, 09:53

Re: Williams FW36 Mercedes

Post

I personally find the solution for the cooling air outlet, as the best in the formula 1 A very low fluidic turbulence and a very good hot air inflow at the monkey seat.

User avatar
ringo
230
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: Williams FW36 Mercedes

Post

the weakness with the williams cooling outlet is that it has a longer portion of bodywor ahead of the diffuser tail with low quality air flow, though it may be hot.
The other teams have extended their cooling ducts to as far back as possible to have more controlled flow over as much of the length of the car as possible.
A good upgrade for this cart is to have the ducts/skirts extended to to the diffuser just as the other cars.
For Sure!!

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Williams FW36 Mercedes

Post

ringo wrote:the weakness with the williams cooling outlet is that it has a longer portion of bodywor ahead of the diffuser tail with low quality air flow, though it may be hot.
The other teams have extended their cooling ducts to as far back as possible to have more controlled flow over as much of the length of the car as possible.
A good upgrade for this cart is to have the ducts/skirts extended to to the diffuser just as the other cars.
Argh, why on earth would you make such a wild assumption?

Do you think Williams is so dumb that they haven't tested a solution like that in CFD and the wind tunnel at some point over the last 3 years? Or have they stuck with the same layout at the rear just to allow armchair aerodynamicists to tell them what they should be doing?

Hobbs04
Hobbs04
5
Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 19:18

Re: Williams FW36 Mercedes

Post

beelsebob wrote:
ringo wrote:the weakness with the williams cooling outlet is that it has a longer portion of bodywor ahead of the diffuser tail with low quality air flow, though it may be hot.
The other teams have extended their cooling ducts to as far back as possible to have more controlled flow over as much of the length of the car as possible.
A good upgrade for this cart is to have the ducts/skirts extended to to the diffuser just as the other cars.
Argh, why on earth would you make such a wild assumption?

Do you think Williams is so dumb that they haven't tested a solution like that in CFD and the wind tunnel at some point over the last 3 years? Or have they stuck with the same layout at the rear just to allow armchair aerodynamicists to tell them what they should be doing?
Considering ringo's comment, b-bob please explain why then does Williams rear end look like such a hack job compared to the coke bottles, ellipses, tucked in, tidy, clean, and any other ways to describe the back end of these cars.

My assumption is the cost vs gain isn't enough and looking back a few pages around Spanish gp the black cover over the gear box could be changed quickly easing the repair time and also could test several different covers with out having to change entire rear bodywork.

http://www.f1technical.net/forum/viewto ... &start=540
Scroll down through photos

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Williams FW36 Mercedes

Post

Hobbs04 wrote:Considering ringo's comment, b-bob please explain why then does Williams rear end look like such a hack job compared to the coke bottles, ellipses, tucked in, tidy, clean, and any other ways to describe the back end of these cars.
I don't know, I'm not a williams engineer, and I don't have the aero simulations. It's clear though that an entire team of engineers thinks that this is the best solution available to them right now though.
My assumption is the cost vs gain isn't enough and looking back a few pages around Spanish gp the black cover over the gear box could be changed quickly easing the repair time and also could test several different covers with out having to change entire rear bodywork.
The fact that you've seen a cover over it tells you that it's nothing to do with cost. The team already ate the cost of designing and producing a cover over this part, and it clearly didn't perform as well. They simply have a different philosophy from the other teams.

User avatar
FW17
169
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: Williams FW36 Mercedes

Post

beelsebob wrote:
Do you think Williams is so dumb that they haven't tested a solution like that in CFD and the wind tunnel at some point over the last 3 years? Or have they stuck with the same layout at the rear just to allow armchair aerodynamicists to tell them what they should be doing?
Williams are smarter than the armchair aero guys but are pretty dumb in comparison to other f1 engineers looking at the results of the last few years, they are even being beaten on a regular basis by a Force India

rich1701
rich1701
8
Joined: 11 Sep 2009, 17:09

Re: Williams FW36 Mercedes

Post

I'd say Williams have gained a huge performance swing over the winter in comparison to last year. The car is better than the force India marginally and they have over taken Mclaren. That is an incredible achievement for the Williams engineers, let's not forget this. What irritates me is they have totally failed to get the best out of their car. The race team itself is failing.

stefan_
stefan_
696
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 12:43
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Re: Williams FW36 Mercedes

Post

Austria 2014 - Wednesday (18.06.2014)

Image
Image
Image
Image
"...and there, very much in flames, is Jacques Laffite's Ligier. That's obviously a turbo blaze, and of course, Laffite will be able to see that conflagration in his mirrors... he is coolly parking the car somewhere safe." Murray Walker, San Marino 1985

User avatar
FrukostScones
162
Joined: 25 May 2010, 17:41
Location: European Union

Re: Williams FW36 Mercedes

Post

Image

Image

Image
the Thing from Brixworth :mrgreen:
Finishing races is important, but racing is more important.

hardingfv32
hardingfv32
35
Joined: 03 Apr 2011, 19:42

Re: Williams FW36 Mercedes

Post

1) Do you think that the tail pipe must be assemble with the transaxle?

2) What is the external device around the tail pipe?

Brian