Pierce89 wrote:basti313 wrote:Pierce89 wrote:What makes you think Mclaren didn't have an interconnected suspension before last year? Hell, Marussia started 2013 with one.
Anyways the reason I posted is... how do Mobil1 develop fuel? I'm pretty sure they have no access to the Merc engine. If they're doing it all through computer simulation and past experience.... sheesh! No wonder they're behind Petronas.
I do not think they did not have one before. But they had obviously a completely different, very stiff suspension on the 2012 car. In 2013 they went for more rake and a soft rear suspension. This makes another sort of interconnected suspension necessary. One which controls the front height on the straights to keep the splitter from hitting the ground too much, but just having it touching the ground. Redbull is perfect on this...
So, it is nothing that is not obvious that they have a new suspension since 2013. You can see it by looking at the different aero-solution/rake.
You're talking about different setup philosophies, not different types of suspension. All the large teams have been running interconnected suspensions for a fair few years, but Merc is the only one proven to have the large amount of hydraulic wizardry,so far.
Well, it is hard to discuss this if you do not have a clue about the different hydraulic tweaks and that there are many completely different types of interconnected suspensions...
It is just a fact, that you would never use the front lifting suspension if you not need to do it for the rake, because it compromises the rest of the suspension. And if you do, you need a completely different design of the interconnected suspension.
As I said: The only ones who are really good at this are Merc and Redbull and this makes their aero work so good, that they are nearly a second ahead of the rest of the field with their chassis. And I do not see a difference in Merc's and Redbull's solutions. Both have front height control and roll stability at a very high level without compromising the rest too much.