Rear suspension geometry change? Hard to tell because of different bodywork, but I think so.
Source: http://www.f1analisitecnica.com/2014/06 ... sulla.html
Rikhart wrote:Rear suspension geometry change? Hard to tell because of different bodywork, but I think so.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-jT_GqmEaKno/U ... ecarlo.jpg
Source: http://www.f1analisitecnica.com/2014/06 ... sulla.html
I see that they are trying really hard to generate a positive pressure at the end of the "coke bottle" but I fell like even doing so, they still would need to increase the rake to further increase the upwash and generate DF.zioture wrote:New Bodywork TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
http://www.newsf1.it/wp-content/uploads ... rrari2.jpg
http://www.newsf1.it/wp-content/uploads ... ffuser.jpg
At the end of the day minimizing air friction and intake length is what you want, but if you have compromised runners, all of that will go down the drain. I have seen guys change their turbo intake manifolds and reap tens of horsepower. So you have to Keep that in mind when it's clear Ferrari have the weakest engine combined with a midfield chassis even when they created this car all under one roof..poz wrote:It's a turbo engine. The key is to minimize air intake length, not to minimize air friction.n smikle wrote: I think the ferrari has severely compromised intake runners with that big old intercooler between the banks. Not to mention the air has to take a u-turn then a 90 degree turn in another axis. They must have alot of guide vanes inside that thing!