+2.adrianjordan wrote:Should be an option for Don't Care.
should be an option for
"give it a rest will ya, sheesh get over it."
for crying out loud
not even gonna bother voting on this one, too silly for words.
+2.adrianjordan wrote:Should be an option for Don't Care.
Certainly it can tolerate a few more after all the driver "x" is better than driver "y" debates that were allowed to go on, or the out and out ignoring of black and white technical matters were allowed to slide.FoxHound wrote:Really?
What the hell is going on here?
Dirty washing in public is unbecoming.
Gitanes, we get how you feel. But this crusade of yours is farcical.
Deal with it like an adult, it is not you that is banned.
Besides, X may be back in time when things settle down.
Time, the great healer.
Not sure how many more "x is banned" variations of threads this place can tolerate.
Now man up!
I think this covers it!wesley123 wrote:What's the point of this thread?
We have merged the other topics into one. Same will happen with this once it's 'purpose', whatever that is, is served. Honestly, the voting up until just reflects the same balance as the other threads did.wesley123 wrote:What's the point of this thread?
Also, why is this third thread necessary? I would have thought it would be clear as to why xpensive received the banhammer even if you disagreed with the decision.
This stopped being a technical forum in any true sense long ago.Belatti wrote:I do not know what happened with X and I dont care.
Just want to say that I used to be arround when he came in with his arrogant comments and was one of the things that made me go away (among many many others)..
Then I decided to ignore his remarks and recently I understood that his sense of humour is something he cant avoid.
In a tech forum he is not a necessity, in a chit chat forum he may be funny.
You should do some more research into the themes of the movie...which explores the idea of freedom in the abstract and in the real world.J.A.W. wrote:GitanesBlondes wrote:This whole thing sort of reminds me of this clip...I'm sure some more astute individuals can draw their own conclusions from this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjYAEtO-Ohk
What conclusions?
That if you are a hapless unarmed hippy, then don't go riling up shotgun-happy rednecks?
Or,
If you wanna be a tough, in-your-face attitude biker, best pack some useful heat.. to back it up..
What qualifications do you have, that makes you qualified to judge the qualifications of the moderators?GitanesBlondes wrote: Qualified means they have an engineering degree and real world engineering experience in the relevant fields, and as such are highly qualified to speak on matters of technical engineering.
GitanesBlondes wrote:
You should do some more research into the themes of the movie...which explores the idea of freedom in the abstract and in the real world.
Oh because I've been here far longer than you have buddy boy....and when you know who the real engineers are, it gives you a lot of insight into who actually knows their stuff.dans79 wrote:What qualifications do you have, that makes you qualified to judge the qualifications of the moderators?GitanesBlondes wrote: Qualified means they have an engineering degree and real world engineering experience in the relevant fields, and as such are highly qualified to speak on matters of technical engineering.
Except we're not talking about anything but one movie.J.A.W. wrote:GitanesBlondes wrote:
You should do some more research into the themes of the movie...which explores the idea of freedom in the abstract and in the real world.
Yeah, well G-T, seems Dennis Hopper reconsidered what that meant, when he made this flick a couple of years later..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8Lh9nsaqLg ..go to 16min in for an apropos 5min 'peckerwood' vignette..