The car was understeering at some corners and rear trying to snap out at some corners specially for Vettel but that's normal as everyone was struggling with the same thing except Merc which looked balanced.dans79 wrote:I'm not sure I would agree with that, from the on board footage I saw, it looked like the car was trying to kill the drivers every time it got a chance. It looked to have sever snap over-steer.Sevach wrote:Ferrari's Q pace wasn't on totally empty tanks they kept going for 4/5 laps, car seemed super nice, good turn in, smooth power delivery.
I think it was the other way around. They were better in qualification mode because they could use a one lap full 4MJ worth from the ES. They couldn't do that during the race lap after lap. Their sustained power for a race was much lower than the other teams.giantfan10 wrote:running lighter may have played a small role but the primary reason was the fact that ferrari could not produce enough electricity to do a full lap at max ouput ...
so when the other cars turned up the power for quali ferrari was basically left behind in quali mode.
the problem was masked in the race bacause no car runs at max output for the entire race.
that i'm willing to bet was their number one priority as far as the updated PU was concerned this offseason
I'd put money on Williams in 3rd. Ferrari does look much improved this year, though.Chene_Mostert wrote:Yes, last year Ferrari was a total mess in all aspects of their the game.Raleigh wrote:I just looked through ESPNs coverage of last years races, not once did Ferrari match their best FP position of the weekend in qualifying.
FP1 - looking good - FP2 - looking good - FP3 - looking good - Quali - nowhere
Every single weekend from Australia to Abu Dhabi.
But hey, new management and drivers, clearly better car, might have changed their policy of running light in practice. Just have to wait for tomorrow to see where people really are.
It was a all time low for them and they will just move forward from there. We will have a Ferrari in P3 at the end of Q3 with a gap to P1 of no more than 0.6X.
Hello, welcomeS.vettel wrote:hello evry1
I nominate red bull to surprise come q3.dren wrote:
I'd put money on Williams in 3rd. Ferrari does look much improved this year, though.
So much for your anticipation. That was a damp squib of a session.mika vs michael wrote:Less than six hours for the first session of the year...bring it on!!!
People keeping saying this like we know he was given a choice to stay. Supposedly tensions were high at Ferrari and the boss didn't want people of his character in the team.S.vettel wrote:By seeing ferrari performance i guess alonso shld hv stayed.....
The water cooler talk I heard was that Alonso was tired of being slowly pushed into the mid-field pack and wanted a winning car. Knowing that not only would Ferrari have to catch up to the development of the Mercedes engine but would have to pass it, along with building a good chassis which hasn't been great for years.J0rd4n wrote:People keeping saying this like we know he was given a choice to stay. Supposedly tensions were high at Ferrari and the boss didn't want people of his character in the team.S.vettel wrote:By seeing ferrari performance i guess alonso shld hv stayed.....
I'd put money on an Alonso podium or two later in the season.PlatinumZealot wrote:True, but Alonso is thinking of 2016. He doesn't really care about 2015.
They supposedly used four engines in pre season testing. Even if they become competitive they may be sent to the back of the grid anyway if they've eaten through all their engines. Just throwing out a potential situation.dren wrote:I'd put money on an Alonso podium or two later in the season.PlatinumZealot wrote:True, but Alonso is thinking of 2016. He doesn't really care about 2015.