Australia 2015 - Thursday (12.03.2015)
But you can see Office 356, so Microsoft is still a sponsor.GM7 wrote:Look at the sidepods...AMC and Microsoft Dynamique arn't there :/
Probably a result of being conservative with the cooling. They'll get better as they develop the car, once they understand how far they can push the cooling.AlainProst wrote:The front wing is the same than last year isn't it ?
R Grosjean says Lotus the car lacks of downforce
Ok but were can you win downforce on this car ?godlameroso wrote:Probably a result of being conservative with the cooling. They'll get better as they develop the car, once they understand how far they can push the cooling.AlainProst wrote:The front wing is the same than last year isn't it ?
R Grosjean says Lotus the car lacks of downforce
As I said before car was drastically underdeveloped whole testing. No pushing any limits. From cooling, from size of sidepods, biggest airbox along Toro Rosso. Using last year front wing, last year rear wing. I dont know how can car be faster and how more downforce than last year car if you use same components from last year.AlainProst wrote:The front wing is the same than last year isn't it ?
R Grosjean says Lotus the car lacks of downforce
Yeah, it's my question. The front wing and the rear wing are the same than last year. We must believe that 2014 front and rear wing wera aerodynamically good...Neno wrote:As I said before car was drastically underdeveloped whole testing. No pushing any limits. From cooling, from size of sidepods, biggest airbox along Toro Rosso. Using last year front wing, last year rear wing. I dont know how can car be faster and how more downforce than last year car if you use same components from last year.AlainProst wrote:The front wing is the same than last year isn't it ?
R Grosjean says Lotus the car lacks of downforce
Loss of power, they retired immediately to prevent losing PU.AlainProst wrote:Somebody know the cause of this premature end of Grosjean race ?
Is it a engine problem ?