and merc are to be checked by fia before next raceajnšpric_pumpa wrote:Lots of reports from track in BCN saying Ferrari slower due to new FIA fuel flow mesurment.
and merc are to be checked by fia before next raceajnšpric_pumpa wrote:Lots of reports from track in BCN saying Ferrari slower due to new FIA fuel flow mesurment.
Given that they lose about .5 second in last sector (low speed, needs good traction) I would tend to think fuel flow has very little to do with Ferraris performance here.ajnšpric_pumpa wrote:Lots of reports from track in BCN saying Ferrari slower due to new FIA fuel flow mesurment.
Good question!Artur Craft wrote:Any technical reason to why Ferrari suddenly became so slow, compared to Mercedes, on low speed corners?
Any source?ajnšpric_pumpa wrote:Lots of reports from track in BCN saying Ferrari slower due to new FIA fuel flow mesurment.
Yep, I noticed that Williams was quicker out of the chickane than Ferrari. Wonder if the problem is on the suspension or on the engine side.henra wrote:Good question!Artur Craft wrote:Any technical reason to why Ferrari suddenly became so slow, compared to Mercedes, on low speed corners?
One possibility would be that they have a traction Problem. Seb couldn't get past Bottas in the last race and now it happened to Kimi as well. In both cases they lost out heavily at the beginning of the straight. Naybe more a mechanical than aerodynamic issue?
A mercedes engined car was checked and approved under the current rules.gilgen wrote:and merc are to be checked by fia before next raceajnšpric_pumpa wrote:Lots of reports from track in BCN saying Ferrari slower due to new FIA fuel flow mesurment.
Kimi said that compared to other cars the Williams were very difficult to follow. He could easily catch them, but couldn't close the gap. Apparently Williams leaves behind a wake of very dirty air compared to others.henra wrote: Good question!
One possibility would be that they have a traction Problem. Seb couldn't get past Bottas in the last race and now it happened to Kimi as well. In both cases they lost out heavily at the beginning of the straight. Naybe more a mechanical than aerodynamic issue?
http://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/analy ... flow-ratesferkan wrote:Given that they lose about .5 second in last sector (low speed, needs good traction) I would tend to think fuel flow has very little to do with Ferraris performance here.ajnšpric_pumpa wrote:Lots of reports from track in BCN saying Ferrari slower due to new FIA fuel flow mesurment.
Didn't seem to be the biggest problem in other places like Sepang where Vettel was the fastest/cofastest on S1/3 but was almost 0,6s down on Rosberg's S2(Vettel only used Primes on Sepang's qualifying). Previously, Ferrari's biggest gap was on downforce sectors. In Barcelona, it turned out the opposite. They were no more than a couple of tenths down on S1/S2(where the mid-high speed corners are) but 0,45s down on S3turbof1 wrote: Ferrari always had less traction the Mercedes; that has been since winter testing apperent. Expect it to be very noticable in Monaco.
I too surprised with the same in Bahrain also they are very quick in S3 which is mostly Traction section. Perhaps with the updates they too much focused on Aero which might have made a comprised suspensionArtur Craft wrote:Didn't seem to be the biggest problem in other places like Sepang where Vettel was the fastest/cofastest on S1/3 but was almost 0,6s down on Rosberg's S2(Vettel only used Primes on Sepang's qualifying). Previously, Ferrari's biggest gap was on downforce sectors. In Barcelona, it turned out the opposite. They were no more than a couple of tenths down on S1/S2(where the mid-high speed corners are) but 0,45s down on S3turbof1 wrote: Ferrari always had less traction the Mercedes; that has been since winter testing apperent. Expect it to be very noticable in Monaco.
Before Barcelona, I was expecting Ferrari to be a real threat in Monaco but, now, I think Mercedes will easily walk again.
This is indeed strange. Kimi in the old configuration in his fastest S3 was much faster than Vettel. Edit: And in Qual, he was on par with Vettel in the last sector, but losing heavily in S1 and esp. in S2.Artur Craft wrote:Didn't seem to be the biggest problem in other places like Sepang where Vettel was the fastest/cofastest on S1/3 but was almost 0,6s down on Rosberg's S2(Vettel only used Primes on Sepang's qualifying). Previously, Ferrari's biggest gap was on downforce sectors. In Barcelona, it turned out the opposite. They were no more than a couple of tenths down on S1/S2(where the mid-high speed corners are) but 0,45s down on S3turbof1 wrote: Ferrari always had less traction the Mercedes; that has been since winter testing apperent. Expect it to be very noticable in Monaco.
Before Barcelona, I was expecting Ferrari to be a real threat in Monaco but, now, I think Mercedes will easily walk again.
It is good that testing resumes this week. Ferrari need time to learn about their new updates. According to Mr: Arrivabene 70% of the car is new. They need time for fine-tuning set-up.Harsha wrote:I too surprised with the same in Bahrain also they are very quick in S3 which is mostly Traction section. Perhaps with the updates they too much focused on Aero which might have made a comprised suspensionArtur Craft wrote:Didn't seem to be the biggest problem in other places like Sepang where Vettel was the fastest/cofastest on S1/3 but was almost 0,6s down on Rosberg's S2(Vettel only used Primes on Sepang's qualifying). Previously, Ferrari's biggest gap was on downforce sectors. In Barcelona, it turned out the opposite. They were no more than a couple of tenths down on S1/S2(where the mid-high speed corners are) but 0,45s down on S3turbof1 wrote: Ferrari always had less traction the Mercedes; that has been since winter testing apperent. Expect it to be very noticable in Monaco.
Before Barcelona, I was expecting Ferrari to be a real threat in Monaco but, now, I think Mercedes will easily walk again.