- Login or Register
No account yet? Sign up
Nico Rosberg has won the Austrian Grand Prix for the second year in succession, taking the upper hand on his team in the first corner of the first lap. Hamilton finished second, ahead of Felipe Massa who puts Williams on the podium again.
dren wrote:Hamilton for the win. Rosberg in second. One of the Williams in third.
Aero advantage vs who exactly? Manor?ajnšpric_pumpa wrote:if it rains Mclaren aero advantage will be crucial!
you know that is not true.Juzh wrote:Aero advantage vs who exactly? Manor?ajnšpric_pumpa wrote:if it rains Mclaren aero advantage will be crucial!
Only that I don't believe Andrew Benson at all about anything, and this claim is particularly spurious.ajnšpric_pumpa wrote:100% engine aside,and after this new aero concept aplied Mclaren should be in top 3 cars from aerodynamic piont of view!
Ask Andrew!
Although Ferrari has done a fantastic job this year to recover it's chassis and PU, ultimately Mclaren will win title before Ferrari does.f1316 wrote:Only that I don't believe Andrew Benson at all about anything, and this claim is particularly spurious.ajnšpric_pumpa wrote:100% engine aside,and after this new aero concept aplied Mclaren should be in top 3 cars from aerodynamic piont of view!
Ask Andrew!
Why do I know better than a long standing f1 journalist, I hear you cry? Well obviously I don't, but many other pundits I respect far more - inc. Scarbs on recent sky programme and Martin Brundle regularly during races - have questioned whether the chassis is really up to scratch even if it did have a better PU.
But I definitely would enjoy the opportunity theory to see that tested on a wet track
Ferrari wont be racing you mean? Merc 1-2 and a Williams in 3 sounds only possible with Ferrari deciding to sit out of the Austrian GP.ajnšpric_pumpa wrote:dren wrote:Hamilton for the win. Rosberg in second. One of the Williams in third.
it's going to rain,rain hard,driver influence will matter much more than usual.
Fernando Alonso will win.
Thank you,be good,by,by!
they will but their driver par tends to mess up things.....wickedz50 wrote:Ferrari wont be racing you mean? Merc 1-2 and a Williams in 3 sounds only possible with Ferrari deciding to sit out of the Austrian GP.ajnšpric_pumpa wrote:dren wrote:Hamilton for the win. Rosberg in second. One of the Williams in third.
it's going to rain,rain hard,driver influence will matter much more than usual.
Fernando Alonso will win.
Thank you,be good,by,by!
Nah, Vettel for WDC 2016ajnšpric_pumpa wrote:Although Ferrari has done a fantastic job this year to recover it's chassis and PU, ultimately Mclaren will win title before Ferrari does.
Why is that? Is Honda engine department better then Ferrari? Do they have more funds? What has Mclaren shown last few years (not to talk about this years embarasment) that would lead you to conclude that?ajnšpric_pumpa wrote:Although Ferrari has done a fantastic job this year to recover it's chassis and PU, ultimately Mclaren will win title before Ferrari does.f1316 wrote:Only that I don't believe Andrew Benson at all about anything, and this claim is particularly spurious.ajnšpric_pumpa wrote:100% engine aside,and after this new aero concept aplied Mclaren should be in top 3 cars from aerodynamic piont of view!
Ask Andrew!
Why do I know better than a long standing f1 journalist, I hear you cry? Well obviously I don't, but many other pundits I respect far more - inc. Scarbs on recent sky programme and Martin Brundle regularly during races - have questioned whether the chassis is really up to scratch even if it did have a better PU.
But I definitely would enjoy the opportunity theory to see that tested on a wet track
Why is that? Is Honda engine department better then Ferrari? Do they have more funds? What has Mclaren shown last few years (not to talk about this years embarasment) that would lead you to conclude that?[/quote]ferkan wrote:Although Ferrari has done a fantastic job this year to recover it's chassis and PU, ultimately Mclaren will win title before Ferrari does.ajnšpric_pumpa wrote:Only that I don't believe Andrew Benson at all about anything, and this claim is particularly spurious.f1316 wrote:1
Why do I know better than a long standing f1 journalist, I hear you cry? Well obviously I don't, but many other pundits I respect far more - inc. Scarbs on recent sky programme and Martin Brundle regularly during races - have questioned whether the chassis is really up to scratch even if it did have a better PU.
But I definitely would enjoy the opportunity theory to see that tested on a wet track
off-throttle and blow diffuser to aid rear DF is gone so Vettel title prospect is gone whit it.ME4ME wrote:Nah, Vettel for WDC 2016ajnšpric_pumpa wrote:Although Ferrari has done a fantastic job this year to recover it's chassis and PU, ultimately Mclaren will win title before Ferrari does.