PlatinumZealot wrote:He claimed he was four tenths up on Rosberg at the second sector... Ominous if he figures out how to keep it on the black stuff in S3.
Vettel's fastest lap on softs was on 13-lap-old tyres and he could have gone faster but aborted the lap and returned to boxes, so Hamilton's lap was nothing special.drunkf1fan wrote: Hamilton's soft tire time was immense and most important the 11th lap on soft tires.
Pirelli is failing to deliver performance on the tires, their tyre choices are extremely conservative and their 2015 compounds aren't faster either, hoping for MICHELIN magic in 2017!!!! (if it happens)Juzh wrote:This year's fp2 time is slower than last year. I wouldn't bet on any records being broken.
I think you've found me here, JordanF1? Nice to see a fellow redditor here. Which bits didn't you agree with?drunkf1fan wrote:PlatinumZealot wrote:He claimed he was four tenths up on Rosberg at the second sector... Ominous if he figures out how to keep it on the black stuff in S3.
When Hamilton is at his absolute best he goes beyond the limit, makes mistakes, then either finds a way to tune the car to the limits or he will pull back just marginally to stay on the track. He's better than anyone else on the grid at this and does it all the time. People kept complaining he was making mistakes at several tracks this year then goes away and blows everyone away in qualifying. Safe drivers go and try and find a 1/10th from the safe side of their limit. THe absolute best drivers thrash the car, go beyond the limits and come back the other way. The advantage being if you do a safe lap and build, you can never really be sure where the limit is. When you do a beyond the limit lap you definitely know where the limit is.
Hamilton's soft tire time was immense and most important the 11th lap on soft tires. He'd put in a few fast pace laps and one qualifying pace lap already with some slower laps in between. Used tires and where he was.... with a clean lap I'd put him 3-4/10th's clear which is apparently what Hamilton thinks also.
As for race pace, not sure why people still compare times. Even Rosberg pointed it out after FP3 I think in Canada. When asked about times compared to Ferrari he said along the lines of he hadn't seen the times but the times don't matter. In so many words he basically said the teams go over the data, work out fuel and engine power level everyone else used, know what settings they used and then and only then you get a comparison.
A guy on reddit who links his analysis of long run times from race to race, I don't agree with everything he says but the fact that Mercedes generally show a race pace 0.5-1 second ahead of their FP2 times while importantly Ferrari rarely do.
People all season have gotten excited about Ferrari pace in Fp2 matching or appearing ahead of Merc yet in the race Merc gain a second. From the general trend of the past 2.5 years Merc tend to run heavy fuel/lower engine power in Fp2, Ferrari run lighter fuel or higher engine power and tend to show realistic race pace numbers. Williams tend to have a changing program, their FP2 times don't seem to tally with race pace in a consistent way.
Ferrari don't look very close to Merc to me, Williams may be closer to Ferrari than normal but I don't think the fastest WIlliams will look particularly close to the fastest Ferrari here.
Except factoring in that Hamilton's was a single run, Vettel pitted half way through and with tire temp being one of the single biggest factors in both tire deg and overall grip(so shorter runs are beneficial). As with most cars Vettel did a run and had a 10 minute gap before his second run. Most cars go out, adjust to conditions make some set up changes that usually dial in to the track and give more speed. THen also 15-20 mins later into the session track conditions are likely improved. All of which reinforce why I believe Hamilton's time which was still faster than Vettel's was a very very good lap.Overdriving wrote:Vettel's fastest lap on softs was on 13-lap-old tyres and he could have gone faster but aborted the lap and returned to boxes, so Hamilton's lap was nothing special.drunkf1fan wrote: Hamilton's soft tire time was immense and most important the 11th lap on soft tires.
That said, I'm sure it will be a Merc on pole as usual.
And yet you're discarding that Vettel missed the entire FP1 and did no previous setup work. That's far more impressive I think.drunkf1fan wrote:Except factoring in that Hamilton's was a single run, Vettel pitted half way through and with tire temp being one of the single biggest factors in both tire deg and overall grip(so shorter runs are beneficial). As with most cars Vettel did a run and had a 10 minute gap before his second run. Most cars go out, adjust to conditions make some set up changes that usually dial in to the track and give more speed. THen also 15-20 mins later into the session track conditions are likely improved. All of which reinforce why I believe Hamilton's time which was still faster than Vettel's was a very very good lap.Overdriving wrote:Vettel's fastest lap on softs was on 13-lap-old tyres and he could have gone faster but aborted the lap and returned to boxes, so Hamilton's lap was nothing special.drunkf1fan wrote: Hamilton's soft tire time was immense and most important the 11th lap on soft tires.
That said, I'm sure it will be a Merc on pole as usual.