manchild wrote:I've expected scarbs of all people to be at least a bit more neutral. His waving with number of evidence pages of data Mclaren used is very hypocrite. He as well as many other forum members are ignoring simple, proven, official fact that STR did not use just partial data of RBR but absolutely each and every detail of RBR blueprints and what did FIA do about it? Nothing!
What about number of pages of data SA took from Honda's RA106? What did FIA do about that? Nothing!
What did FIA do with Toyota after two former Ferrari engineers were sentenced and jailed for taking out CDs with data? Nothing!
Concorde agreement and if I'm not mistaken FIA sporting regulations leave no possibility of legal possession of other teams blueprints. You can't buy them and you can sell them. If you have them you have them illegally.
If Mclaren is punished so severely for using Ferrari data why isn't STR punished for using absolutely all existing RBR data? Why isn't SA punished for using Honda data? Why isn't Toyota punished for using Ferrari data?
I don't deny that Mclaren had those data and that it is illegal but STR, SA and Toyota had immeasurably much more data from other teams and they go unpunished for years.
Why? Because their punishment wouldn't give Ferrari a WCC title.
bhallg2k wrote:That's comparing apples to oranges. McLaren using secret Ferrari information is not the same as RBR/STR being the same company and doing something that in a year's time will be commonplace. The same can be said for the relationship between Honda and Super Aguri.
If that's your viewpoint about the respect of law and truth than I'm deeply sorry for wasting time to clear up things.bhallg2k wrote:but in the end, justice was done.
No honour?Torso wrote:McLarens drivers should be stripped of their championship points now that we know the current McLaren has got it`s advantages stolen from the data owned by Ferrari.
Neither Alonso or Hamilton are worthy champions. It is a disgrace that McLaren is allowed to win the drivers title (wich is the one that really counts) like this.
Dennis has no honour. If he had he would pull his team out and never return. His team has no place in motorsport anymore.
GET LOST CHEATERS!!
What a rubbish post.manchild wrote:I've expected scarbs of all people to be at least a bit more neutral. His waving with number of evidence pages of data Mclaren used is very hypocrite. He as well as many other forum members are ignoring simple, proven, official fact that STR did not use just partial data of RBR but absolutely each and every detail of RBR blueprints and what did FIA do about it? Nothing!
What about number of pages of data SA took from Honda's RA106? What did FIA do about that? Nothing!
What did FIA do with Toyota after two former Ferrari engineers were sentenced and jailed for taking out CDs with data? Nothing!
Concorde agreement and if I'm not mistaken FIA sporting regulations leave no possibility of legal possession of other teams blueprints. You can't buy them and you can sell them. If you have them you have them illegally.
If Mclaren is punished so severely for using Ferrari data why isn't STR punished for using absolutely all existing RBR data? Why isn't SA punished for using Honda data? Why isn't Toyota punished for using Ferrari data?
I don't deny that Mclaren had those data and that it is illegal but STR, SA and Toyota had immeasurably much more data from other teams and they go unpunished for years.
Why? Because their punishment wouldn't give Ferrari a WCC title.